Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-4 of 4
Employees may have committed a crime by violating employer’s computer use policy
- Proskauer Rose LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 11 2011
In this criminal proceeding brought under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), the United States government filed a 20-count indictment against David Nosal (a former employee of KornFerry International) and his accomplices (also from KornFerry) as a result of their obtaining information from their employer’s computer system for the purpose of defrauding KornFerry and helping Nosal set up a competing business
Employee violation of employer computer use policy can support CFAA criminal charge
- Proskauer Rose LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 5 2011
An employee's violation of an employer's computer use policy can support a criminal charge of exceeding authorized access under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, a district court ruled
Under New York law, vendor’s specific representations of software functionality support claim for fraudulent inducement
- Proskauer Rose LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 29 2010
Specific representations made by a salesman concerning the functionality of a software system which the purchaser alleges was inadequate for its purposes support the purchaser's claim for fraudulent inducement, a district court ruled
Employee access to computer network in furtherance of criminal fraud “exceeds authorized access” under CFAA
- Proskauer Rose LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- April 14 2010
An employee who accessed financial data on her employer's computer network in violation of official policy in order to perpetrate a criminal scheme exceeded her authorized access to the network within the meaning of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled
