We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 48

Recent lawsuits allege anticompetitive market allocation conspiracy by Blue Cross and Blue Shield

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 24 2012

Two recent lawsuits allege that Blue Cross and Blue Shield entities in North Carolina and Alabama have violated federal and state antitrust laws by engaging in concerted action with other Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) plans nationwide to divide geographic markets among them, which has allegedly resulted in reduced competition and higher rates charged to end customers for healthcare services

Health insurers’ motion to treble damages against pharmaceutical companies in antitrust case is granted

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 7 2008

On June 1, 2005, after a jury trial lasting over three weeks, a jury found for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (“BCBS-MA”), Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota (“BCBS-MN”), Federated Mutual Insurance Company (“Federated”), and Health Care Service Corporation (“HCSC”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”) against Mylan Laboratories Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambrex Corporation, and Gyma Laboratories (“Defendants”) on state law claims agreement in unreasonable restraint of trade; conspiracy in unreasonable restraint of trade; monopolization; and attempted monopolization in the Lorazepam active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) market, Lorazepam tablet market and in the Clorazepate API and tablet markets

Aetna files antitrust suit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan concerning use of most favored nation clauses

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 12 2011

On December 6, 2011, Aetna filed an antitrust lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, the dominant insurer in Michigan

FTC bars Texas physician group from joint price negotiations

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 13 2011

On May 10, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that an independent practice association representing 900 physicians in the Amarillo, Texas, area agreed to enter in to an FTC Consent Order barring it from jointly negotiating the rates it charges insurance companies

Sidley Austin LLP global pricing newsletter - volume three 2014

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • Brazil, Canada, China, European Union, France, Germany, India, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • April 15 2014

On October 21, 2013, Brazil’s National Agency of Supplemental Health enacted Normative Resolution 388, which mandated that all private healthcare

Department of Justice reaches settlement in first traditional Section 2 case since 1999

  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 2 2011

On February 25, 2011, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it settled an antitrust enforcement action against United Regional Health Care System of Wichita Falls, Texas (United Regional) in which the agency alleged that United Regional had monopolized one or more markets for hospital services by entering into agreements with health insurers not to do business with United Regional's competitors

Stakes raised in Blue Cross of Michigan “most favored nation” clause antitrust dispute as Aaetna jumps in as an antitrust plaintiff

  • Williams Mullen
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 3 2012

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan has been in litigation with the Department of Justice Antitrust Division for more than a year over BCM’s use of “most favored nation” clauses in its contracts with health care providers

New York radiology practice sues health care benefits administration firm contracted with major health care insurers alleging antitrust violations

  • Locke Lord LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 27 2008

A New York based radiology practice (the “Plaintiff”) filed an action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York against a benefits administration firm, CareCore National, LLC, that provides services for insurers including Aetna, GHI, HIP, Healthnet, Healthfirst, and Oxford

FTC continues crackdown on unlawful collective fee negotiations

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 25 2009

The Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) aggressive enforcement of the antitrust laws regarding collective fee negotiations continued this month when the FTC sued a California independent practice association (IPA) for allegedly fixing the prices charged to healthcare insurers

UnitedHealth fined $1 million for breach of merger consent decree

  • Williams Mullen
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2011

On June 23, the Nevada Attorney General’s office announced that it had fined UnitedHealth $1 million for breaching the terms of an antitrust Consent Decree that UnitedHealth had agreed to in 2008 to close its acquisition of Sierra Health, a rival health insurer