We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Are genes patentable? US Court of Appeals says “yes” for the second time

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 23 2012

In March this year, the US Court of Appeals was ordered by the US Supreme Court to reconsider its decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics

European Commission ups the cost of paying for delay

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, USA
  • -
  • August 13 2012

On 25 July 2012, the EC alleged that Danish pharmaceutical company Lundbeck violated EU antitrust rules by colluding to prevent other pharma companies from marketing generic versions of its best-seller antidepressant, citalopram

Myriad Genetics 1 versus ACLU 1 in US gene patents battle

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 3 2011

In a decision that’s sure to find its way to the Supreme Court, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has ruled that isolated genetic sequences are patentable

They’re at it again Australian biotech company pursues alleged infringers in the US

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2011

Australian biotech company Genetic Technologies (GTG) has announced that it has launched a third round of litigation against US biotech and life sciences companies it says are infringing its patented non-coding DNA technology

Competition regulators continue their campaign against pharmaceutical companies

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • June 1 2011

Last month, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released its findings on reverse payment settlements between pharmaceutical companies in the 2010 US fiscal year