We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-9 of 9

Compliance with the ACA contraception rule by a Catholic-owned company preliminarily enjoined

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 2 2012

A second federal court has enjoined the application of the ACA’s (“Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”) rule that would have required a Catholic employer to provide employee health insurance that covers contraception

Wellness plans and the ADA safe harbor: Seff v. Broward revisited

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 22 2012

Many plan sponsors are unaware of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act as it relates to health insurance

The Supreme Court upholds the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: now what?

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

On Thursday, June 28, the United States Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision on the constitutionality of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA

Supreme Court to consider PPACA litigation, or at least to consider considering it

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 7 2011

There are multiple cases related to health care reform (PPACA) that are now ready for consideration by the US Supreme Court

Beware of being overly generous with health benefits: the stop-loss conundrum

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 10 2011

Often times, administrators of self-insured plans make decision based on particular circumstances

PPACA is unconstitutional and 1099 reporting may go away (a rough week for reform)

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 7 2011

Last week was a particularly rough week for health care reform as PPACA took some serious hits

Supreme Court finds medical students are employees for FICA purposes

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 19 2011

In January 11, the Supreme Court ruled Jan. 11 that medical students training to be residents are employees, and not students, and therefore subject to Federal Insurance Contributions Act taxes (Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. United States, U.S., No. 09-837, 11111

Health care reform is unconstitutional, sort-of, at least maybe.

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 13 2010

Before everyone gets excited about engaging in an argument about the constitutionality of health care reform and debating the various cases that are pending on the topic, understand this is not what this posting is about

Supreme Court lets stand San Francisco’s health care ordinance

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 30 2010

In June, the US Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal, brought by San Francisco employers, of a federal court's decision upholding the city's health care law