Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 58

DOL audit letters revised for PPACA: asking for specifics

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
February 12 2013

By off chance, a client sent me a letter from the Department of Labor conducting an audit of their self-funded health plan. While I have responded to

More on PPACA: multiemployer plans and shared responsibility

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
January 28 2013

Earlier this month, Treasury and the IRS published a proposed rule regarding the shared responsibility penalty. The proposed rule describes how the

Proposed rules (and FAQs) on shared responsibility under PPACA

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
January 2 2013

As we ring in 2013, employers should be focused on measuring their obligations under the shared responsibilities provisions of PPACA. On December 28, we

Is my health plan discriminatory? Insured plans and PPACA

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
December 5 2012

With all of the recent talk about calculating the number of employees and determining whether they are subject to PPACA compliance, employers are more and more asking whether they have to worry about discrimination in their health plans

COBRA or not COBRA: that's a good question

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
October 3 2012

For employers with around 20 employees, finding out whether they are subject to COBRA can be confusing

Wellness plans and the ADA safe harbor: Seff v. Broward revisited

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
August 22 2012

Many plan sponsors are unaware of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act as it relates to health insurance

Heath care and W-2s: not all employers report and not all contributions are reported

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
August 17 2012

In conjunction with the passage of PPACA, certain employers are now required to report the "aggregate cost of applicable employer sponsored coverage" under Section 6051(a)(14) on W-2s

PPACA penalties: what individuals without coverage will pay

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
August 14 2012

As we press forward with implementation of health care reform, one of the things that has not been fully discussed is the penalty for not having “minimum essential coverage.”

Changes for August 1, 2012: keeping up with PPACA

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
August 1 2012

As we have discussed previously, PPACA is going to require a number of important changes to plans over the next few years

Benefit plan discrimination testing: the same, but different

Fox Rothschild LLP
-
USA
-
July 13 2012

Although it is not yet in effect, or fully defined, Section 2716 of the Public Health Service Act was revised under PPACA to provide that the anti-discrimination provisions of IRS Code Section 105(h) would apply to insured health plans