We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 25

Privacy Commissioner’s decision set aside by the Federal Court

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 16 2015

A recent decision by Federal Court of Australia illustrated two things about privacy complaints - or at least those that end up before the courts:

The image of deception

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 14 2014

On 10 March 2014, the Federal Court of Australia found that Breast Check Pty Ltd engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct and made false

Australian case notes - Odisho v Bonazzi 2014 VSCA 11

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 20 2014

In this case the appellant, a patient who suffered a thromboembolic event following the use of tranexamic acid, claimed that her doctor had

Federal Court holds that employers can require employees to provide medical reports and undergo medical examinations

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 25 2014

The Federal Court has provided guidance on when an employer can require an employee to obtain a medical report or undergo a medical examination in

Blockbuster drug goes bust? The Federal Court finds three AstraZeneca patents relating to Crestor (rosuvastatin) invalid

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • March 7 2013

In an important decision handed down on Tuesday, Justice Jagot of the Federal Court held that three patents relating to the blockbuster drug Crestor

Breaking news High Court hands down important decision in relation to infringement of pharmaceutical patents

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • December 4 2013

A few hours ago, the High Court handed down its long awaited decision in Apotex v Sanofi. While the High Court confirmed that methods of medical

Pharmaceuticals - copyright in PIs and indirect patent infringement

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • August 4 2011

In the recent decision in Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd v Apotex Pty Ltd (No 3), Justice Jagot of the Federal Court found liability for indirect patent infringement in the context of supply of a pharmaceutical product

It's a fact ... in my opinion

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 5 2011

What happens when the court is asked to pass judgement on that which cannot be proved?

It's all in the definition - "drug" or "pharmaceutical item"

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 19 2011

AstraZeneca has been unsuccessful in its attempt to overturn a decision of the Minister for Health and Ageing to include a particular dose of rosuvastatin (sold as Crestor, to lower cholesterol) in the Statins-HP "therapeutic group" on the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme ("PBS"

Competition regulators continue their campaign against pharmaceutical companies

  • King & Wood Mallesons
  • -
  • Australia, USA
  • -
  • June 1 2011

Last month, the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released its findings on reverse payment settlements between pharmaceutical companies in the 2010 US fiscal year