We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

Securities suits can be brought on non-statistically significant complaints

  • Dechert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 22 2011

So says the unanimous Supreme Court today in Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v, Siracuso, 09-1156, slip op. (U.S. March, 22, 2011

“Statistically significant” standard suffers an adverse event: Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano

  • Dechert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 23 2011

Plaintiffs seeking to assert securities fraud claims against health-care companies based on the failure to disclose adverse event reports will not be required to allege that the reports were "statistically significant," the standard that had been articulated by a number of courts

Why agency fraud is like fraud on the FDA

  • Dechert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 17 2012

In our rather terse (due to firm involvement) post on Monday concerning Merck & Co. v. Ratliff, ___ S.W.3d ___, 2012 WL 413522 (Ky. App. Feb. 10, 2012) beating both BNA and 360 by two days, BTW we mentioned the “interesting” aspects of that case