We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 2,435

Underwriting exclusion bars coverage for claim for failure to notify life insurance applicants of adverse test results obtained as part of application process

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 17 2013

The Iowa Supreme Court, applying Iowa law, has affirmed a lower court's application of an underwriting exclusion to bar coverage for a claim against

Settlement for statutory damages, calculated without reference to actual damages incurred, is for penalty, not covered loss

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 14 2013

A Delaware trial court has held that a settlement for statutory damages paid by a health care organization represents uncovered penalties rather than

Guidance provided on notices to employees of coverage options available through health insurance marketplace

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

This is the 33rd in a series of WorkCite articles concerning the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and its companion statute, the Health

CMS sets provider payment rates under the ACA pre-existing condition insurance plan program

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

The ACA's Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) program is a temporary high-risk health insurance program for uninsured individuals who have

Guidance for self-insured health plans and payment of PCORI fees: IRS revises Form 720

  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 10 2013

For plan sponsors and insurers wondering how to pay the fee for the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (which is due by July 31, 2013 for

Health plan coverage for terminated executives after the Affordable Care Act

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2013

Companies routinely continue the health plan coverage of certain terminated executives. However, an often overlooked fact is that Code Sec. 105(h

Court dismisses challenge to prescription drug copayment coupon program

  • Hunton & Williams LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2013

On June 3, 2013, the US District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed a putative class action alleging that a prescription drug

TPPs not allowed to throw own insureds under the bus

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2013

Third party payer plaintiffs (mostly insurance companies and union welfare funds in unholy alliance with plaintiff lawyers), have not been doing very

California cities and counties can allow, restrict, limit or exclude facilities that distribute medical marijuana

  • Wilson Elser
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 6 2013

The California Supreme Court ruled unanimously on May 6 in City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health and Wellness Center that cities and

The fraud and abuse elephant in the room: are ACA exchanges federal health care programs?

  • Dentons
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 5 2013

Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act ("ACA"), beginning January 1, 2014, certain individuals will be permitted to purchase "qualified health plans"