We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 133

Is a landlord responsible for a tenant’s nuisance?

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 12 2014

The Coventry v Lawrence litigation attracted a lot of attention earlier this year on the subject of when an injunction would be granted to restrain a

Oral hearings and the Financial Services Ombudsman: an update

  • A&L Goodbody
  • -
  • Ireland
  • -
  • September 23 2014

The High Court once again considered the right to an oral hearing before the Financial Services Ombudsman (the FSO) in the case of Carty Doyle -v-

Solicitors' liability limited to the difference between values with and without planning permission SAAMCO principles apply

  • Eversheds LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 19 2014

The recent case of Credit & Mercantile plc v Nabarro (a firm) 2014 EWCH 2819 (Ch) is a first instance decision in which the court applied the

No success with succession

  • MacRoberts LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 17 2014

The Extra Division of the Inner House of the Court of Session recently held that surviving cohabitants do not have a right to make a claim on the

Make smoke alarms compulsory in the private rental sector says Lord Hoyle

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 19 2014

The Labour politician Lord Hoyle has added momentum to the ongoing campaign to make smoke alarms compulsory in rented properties by speaking out in

Landlord liability for tenant nuisance

  • Dentons
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 4 2014

Coventry v. Lawrence first appeared before the Supreme Court in February 2014. The Supreme Court handed down a seminal judgment on issues of

Section 21- the Supreme Court speaks

  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 24 2014

The refusal of permission means that the original decision of the Court of Appeal in this matter is now good law and can be taken as the accurate

Changes to Lexology work area names

  • Lexology
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • July 16 2014

We have changed the titles of some of the work areas on Lexology to make it clearer what they cover

Balancing act: does a South Carolina property owner have a duty to protect its invitees from third-party crime?

  • Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 11 2014

Is a property owner liable when a person is injured on its property by a criminal act committed by a third party over whom the property owner has no

Whose car is it anyway? Car parking on common property

  • Kliger Partners
  • -
  • Australia, Canada
  • -
  • July 10 2014

An owners corporation may make rules for vehicles and parking on common property. Clause 3.2 of the model rules provides: "An owner or occupier of a