We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 46

E-filing: moving states into the twenty-first century

  • Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 26 2013

In May 2012, the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts announced that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit had begun to accept

Context, content and privacy in warrantless searches of cell phone and cameras

  • Dentons
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 24 2013

Context and content matters to the assessment of reasonable expectations of privacy in criminal law matters. Recently, in R. V. B. (C.), 2013

You have the right to Google an attorney in Canada

  • IT-LEX Inc
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 5 2013

A recent Canadian Court ruling found that, following an arrest, a detainee's right to obtain counsel allows for the use of the Internet to find a

Ontario Court of Appeal recognises new tort for invasion of privacy

  • McMillan LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • February 1 2013

Faced with the discovery that someone else had accessed her bank records more than 174 times, without authorisation or any lawful reason, Sandra

Divided Sixth Circuit okays cell phone GPS search

  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 13 2012

Whether the government may freely track individuals using GPS devices, unconstrained by Fourth Amendment search rules, is among the current privacy issues where there seems to be a lack of consensus among federal judges

Warrantless tracking of cell GPS upheld

  • Gardere Wynne Sewell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 17 2012

No warrant was required to track a drug dealer's GPS locations from cell phones since the defendant “did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data emanating from his cell phone that showed its location.”

Sixth Circuit finds no reasonable expectation of privacy in data emanating from cell phone

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 16 2012

In an interesting criminal case, United States v. Skinner (09-6497), the Sixth Circuit rejected a Fourth Amendment challenge by a convicted drug runner based on the government’s tracking of location data from his cell phone

The development of privacy torts in Ontario: a case comment

  • Dentons
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 1 2012

The Court of Appeal for Ontario recently issued the first definitive statement from a Canadian appellate court that there is a common law right of action for intrusion upon seclusion, or invasion of personal privacy

Happy anniversary Charter of Rights and Freedoms

  • Dentons
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 17 2012

Whatever you may think of the patriation of Canada’s Constitution and the the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, it marked a milestone in Canada’s legal history

Ontario Court of Appeal finds a new tort for the invasion of privacy

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 23 2012

On 18 January 2012, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in the case of Jones v. Tsige, recognizing a common law tort for the invasion of privacy in rare circumstances