We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Register

Search by keyword

Jurisdiction

Work area

Firm name

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-1 of 1

O’Beirne v Hudson 9.2.10: the fact that a consent order provided for "standard basis" costs did not prevent a defendant arguing on an assessment of costs that "small claims" costs should apply

Kennedys
-
United Kingdom
-
March 12 2010

The Claimant suffered injury in a minor RTA

Search results

O’Beirne v Hudson 9.2.10: the fact that a consent order provided for "standard basis" costs did not prevent a defendant arguing on an assessment of costs that "small claims" costs should apply

Current Search

Suggested Facets