We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 19

Law Society and Solicitors Regulation Authority join forces to intervene in a landmark professional indemnity insurance case

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 2 2012

The Law Society of England and Wales and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) have been granted leave by the High Court to intervene in the case of Godiva Mortgage Limited v Travelers Insurance in which Travelers is arguing that it is entitled to cap cover by aggregating claims made against its insured, Willmett Solicitors, a Berkshire firm now in liquidation

Solicitors Regulation Authority issues guidance on PPI claims

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 19 2012

On 4 January 2012, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (the SRA) issued guidance to solicitors on their professional duties when dealing with claims relating to mis-sold payment protection insurance (PPI

Advocate General gives opinion in relation to the insurance of injuries caused by unauthorised drivers

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 5 2011

This case (Case C-44210, Churchill Insurance Company Limited v Benjamin and Tracy Evans v Equity Claims Limited) which arose out of two references to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) made in separate cases before the English courts, concerned an issue unique to the system of vehicle insurance in the UK

Bill introduced to reform the regulation and operation of the motor insurance market

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 28 2011

On 13 September 2011, Jack Straw MP introduced the Motor Insurance Regulation Bill (Bill No.229) to Parliament under the Ten Minute Rule

Massachusetts SJC holds homeowners liability insurer can't use guilty plea in related criminal action to deny coverage under Intentional and Criminal Acts exclusion

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 19 2011

While making an arrested of the insured, a Marlborough police officer broke his ankle and was otherwise injured

Supreme Court of Texas overturns $17 million jury verdict against Motor Coach Industries, Inc.

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 23 2010

The Supreme Court of Texas has overturned a $17 million jury verdict against Motor Coach Industries, Inc. in a lawsuit arising from a fatal bus crash

Court of Appeal rules on assessment of damages for personal injury in motor accidents

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 3 2010

In Clinton David Jacobs v Motor Insurance Bureau 2010 EWCA Civ 1208, the Court of Appeal held that where a person is injured by an uninsured driver and is entitled to recover from the Motor Insurers Bureau (MIB), that person is entitled to recover damages assessed according to English law, rather than the law where the accident occurred

Guernsey sets record payout in motor claim

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • Guernsey
  • -
  • October 1 2010

In a recent case, Helmot v Simon (Guernsey Unreported Judgment, 14 September 2010), the Guernsey Court of Appeal provided a UK record for the highest personal injury compensation payment, with the claimant receiving £13.7 million in compensation for personal injuries caused by a road traffic accident

Court finds coverage excluded for shooting by security guard

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 1 2010

A California Appeals Court recently held that a wrongful death action against a security guard who shot a man while on duty was excluded under an "assault and battery" exclusion, even if the security guard acted in self-defense

Third Circuit holds that drunken shooting attempt is not an “accident” for purposes of insurance coverage

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 15 2010

The Third Circuit recently held that an insured who, while intoxicated, allegedly attempted to shoot another person was not covered under his homeowner's insurance policies for the resulting liability, as the attempted shooting could not constitute an "accident."