Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 10

Cadillac Fairview Corp. v. Olympia Sanitation Products Inc.

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
October 14 2010

Cadillac Fairview operated the Promenade Mall

Dominion of Canada General Insurance Co. v. Kingsway General Insurance Co

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
April 19 2011

The defendant in the underlying action was the operator of a vehicle involved in a very serious single car accident where four individuals were either killed or badly injured

Hruska v. Bridges Golf Club Ltd

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
October 14 2010

The Plaintiff Insured was a passenger in a golf cart driven by a third party along a golf cart path on the premises of the Defendant Bridges Golf Course

Keam v. Caddey

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
November 12 2010

The appellants successfully sued the respondents for damages suffered in a motor vehicle accident

Economical Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lapalme

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
February 23 2011

The insured, Ms. Ginette Lapalme (“Lapalme”), was injured in a two vehicle accident

Danicek v. Alexander Holburn Beaudin & Lang

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
March 24 2011

This was the second phase of a trial of three related actions

Downer v Personal Insurance Co

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
October 12 2011

The defendant, Personal Insurance Co., brought a motion for summary judgement on the basis that personal injuries that plaintiff claimed for pursuant to a policy of insurance were not sustained in an “accident” within the meaning of the s. 2 of the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (Ontario Regulation 40396

Martin v. 2064324 Ontario Inc

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
January 16 2012

The plaintiff was successful in arguing that injuries sustained during an assault in which the assailants made use of his vehicle were injuries that arose directly from the use or operation of the vehicle

Cebryk v. Paragon Enterprises (1984) Ltd. (C.O.B. Armstrong's Physiotherapy Clinic)

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
January 20 2011

This was an appeal of a chambers judge’s ruling trying the plaintiff’s claim against the respondent on the basis of section 40.1 of the Automobile Accident Insurance Act, R.S.S. 1978, c. A-35 (the “Act”

Nelson v. Industrial-Alliance Pacific Life Insurance Company

Harper Grey LLP
-
Canada
-
January 20 2011

This was an action in which the plaintiff sued for benefits under an accidental death and dismemberment insurance policy following the death of her husband, who had died while scuba diving in the lake near their summer cabin