Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 13
Quinn v Bar Standards Board, visitors to the Inns of Court, 25 February 2013
- Kingsley Napley
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- March 8 2013
The Appellant (A) was called to the Bar in 2001. In 2009 the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Bar Standards Board found that (i) A had engaged in actions
Admissibility of hearsay evidence in disciplinary and fitness to practise proceedings
- Kingsley Napley
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- July 8 2011
B, a consultant paediatric cardiologist, was accused of sexually abusing boys in Kenya
O’Connor v Bar Standards Board 2012 All ER (D) 108 (unreported)
- Kingsley Napley
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- August 23 2012
The appellant was a self-employed barrister who had set up a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP
Clinical negligence and personal injury: loss of chance
- Kingsley Napley
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- October 9 2012
The method by which the courts assess whether a future event would have occurred, but for the defendant’s negligence, is at the heart of any determination of causation and is often highly relevant to quantum
Solicitors Regulation Authority v Dennison 2011 ALL ER (D) 320 (MAR)
- Kingsley Napley
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- June 1 2011
D was an equity partner in a firm of solicitors (‘the Firm’
McCarthy v Bar Standards Board, Visitors to the Inns of Court, 25 January 2012
- Kingsley Napley
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- March 1 2012
Rule 7(1)(a) of the Disciplinary Hearing Rules requiring evidence to be served does include statements of witnesses and the withholding of statements to prevent a registrant ‘tempering’ his evidence around the statement is ‘unacceptable’
Gurpinar v Solicitors Regulation Authority 2012 EWHC 192 (Admin)
- Kingsley Napley
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- March 1 2012
Where there is a lack of evidence of a respondent’s attempt to notify a tribunal and other parties of non-attendance, a Court was permitted to conclude that they had not been sent and, in the circumstances, a tribunal was permitted to proceed in absence under s.16(2) of the Solicitors (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules 2007
Case update: Solicitor Regulation Authority v Kaberry (unreported)
- Kingsley Napley
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- November 15 2012
A solicitor (K) had faced allegations of failing to properly keep accounts and offences involving dishonesty before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT
Case update: Patel v Solicitors Regulation Authority 2012 EWHC 3373
- Kingsley Napley
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- November 30 2012
A solicitor (P) appealed under section 49 of the Solicitors Act 1974 against a decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT
Case update: Faniyi v Solicitors Regulation Authority 2012 EWHC 2965 (admin)
- Kingsley Napley
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- October 29 2012
The appellant solicitor (F) was a senior partner in a firm in which the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) had shown interest
Current Search
Suggested Facets
Author
- Ami Patel (1)
- Harriet Roberts (1)
- Heather Hamilton (1)
- Katherine Tyler (1)
- Laura Ryan (1)
- Rekha Randhawa (1)
- Sarah Harris (4)
- Sophie Lister (1)
- Suzanne Farg (1)
- Verity Danziger (1)
