We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 13

Quinn v Bar Standards Board, visitors to the Inns of Court, 25 February 2013

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 8 2013

The Appellant (A) was called to the Bar in 2001. In 2009 the Disciplinary Tribunal of the Bar Standards Board found that (i) A had engaged in actions

Admissibility of hearsay evidence in disciplinary and fitness to practise proceedings

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 8 2011

B, a consultant paediatric cardiologist, was accused of sexually abusing boys in Kenya

O’Connor v Bar Standards Board 2012 All ER (D) 108 (unreported)

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • August 23 2012

The appellant was a self-employed barrister who had set up a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP

Clinical negligence and personal injury: loss of chance

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 9 2012

The method by which the courts assess whether a future event would have occurred, but for the defendant’s negligence, is at the heart of any determination of causation and is often highly relevant to quantum

Solicitors Regulation Authority v Dennison 2011 ALL ER (D) 320 (MAR)

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 1 2011

D was an equity partner in a firm of solicitors (‘the Firm’

McCarthy v Bar Standards Board, Visitors to the Inns of Court, 25 January 2012

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 1 2012

Rule 7(1)(a) of the Disciplinary Hearing Rules requiring evidence to be served does include statements of witnesses and the withholding of statements to prevent a registrant ‘tempering’ his evidence around the statement is ‘unacceptable’

Gurpinar v Solicitors Regulation Authority 2012 EWHC 192 (Admin)

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 1 2012

Where there is a lack of evidence of a respondent’s attempt to notify a tribunal and other parties of non-attendance, a Court was permitted to conclude that they had not been sent and, in the circumstances, a tribunal was permitted to proceed in absence under s.16(2) of the Solicitors (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules 2007

Case update: Solicitor Regulation Authority v Kaberry (unreported)

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 15 2012

A solicitor (K) had faced allegations of failing to properly keep accounts and offences involving dishonesty before the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT

Case update: Patel v Solicitors Regulation Authority 2012 EWHC 3373

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 30 2012

A solicitor (P) appealed under section 49 of the Solicitors Act 1974 against a decision of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT

Case update: Faniyi v Solicitors Regulation Authority 2012 EWHC 2965 (admin)

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 29 2012

The appellant solicitor (F) was a senior partner in a firm in which the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) had shown interest