We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-7 of 7

Family cases - who pays the piper?

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • October 6 2011

Funding legal advice is a perennial difficulty, especially when one party controls the purse strings

New family structures - rose tinted spectacles?

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 16 2012

Family law is always changing to meet the demands of changing family structures

It’s an asset just not a marital one!

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 21 2012

We frequently advise spouses who have significant assets generated prior to their marriage, or who have assets in a trust tax shelter

Mind the gap: why gay marriage changes may be about to take the wrong step

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 19 2012

The recent fuss about Coalition plans to bring in gay marriage hasn’t centred on legal aspects so much as political and cultural ones

International child relocation: a new approach

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 27 2012

Last summer, the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, in MK v CK, signalled a dramatic shift in the approach to international child relocation cases

Inherited wealth in big divorces remains unresolved

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 22 2012

The recent case of Davies v Davies has been widely reported in the press as “the end of multi-million payouts for wives”

“Intolerable cruelty” and the uncertainty of pre-nuptial agreements in England and Wales

  • Kingsley Napley
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 27 2013

Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore's divorce settlement is edging closer and now we know there is no pre-nuptial agreement (unlike the Coen brothers film