We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 47

Rivera v. Mackoul

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 13 2012

In Rivera v. Mackoul, Case No. 10-P-1663, 2012 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 120 (Feb. 3, 2012), a decision issued pursuant to Rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed a judgment in favor of an estate planning attorney for fees incurred in a will contest, where the will was determined to be invalid pursuant to an agreement for judgment

Authorized House Counsel: Connecticut’s official registration application form

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 14 2007

The official application form for registration as Authorized House Counsel in Connecticut is now available on the website of the Connecticut Bar Examining Committee (CBEC

Ingeno v. Meister

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 27 2010

In Ingeno v. Meister, Case No. 09-P-502, 2010 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 58 (Jan. 19, 2010), the Appeals Court affirmed the probate court's construction of a devise of real property

Sherman v. Shub

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2011

In Sherman v. Shub, Case No. SUCV2007-BLS1, 2011 Mass. Super. LEXIS 146 (Suffolk Super. Ct. June 16, 2011), a Superior Court decision that was issued in June but just recently reported, the Court entered summary judgment against the plaintiffs on their Chapter 93A claim against the defendant insurance advisers and attorneys relating to allegedly defective estate plans

Rochalski v. Sklodowski

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2012

In Rochalski v. Sklodowski, Case No. 10-P-1750, 2012 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 12 (Jan. 6, 2012), a decision issued pursuant to Rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed the probate court's judgment voiding certain transactions on grounds of lack of capacity and undue influence

IRS issues DOMA guidance: action steps for employers

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 5 2013

On August 29, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 providing guidance on the effect of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision

New Year's resolution -- make sure your estate plan reflects your wishes

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 17 2013

With the start of a new year and the enactment of a new federal law that will affect estate planning in a variety of ways, now is the time to review

10 tips for outsourcing document reviews to offshore vendors

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2010

Legal departments are increasingly using contract attorneys to conduct document reviews during discovery

Donoghue v. Horner

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 28 2009

Case law relating to trusts and estates is constantly evolving

IRS issues DOMA guidance

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2013

On August 29, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 (the “Revenue Ruling”) providing guidance on the effect of the