We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 47

Sherman v. Shub

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2011

In Sherman v. Shub, Case No. SUCV2007-BLS1, 2011 Mass. Super. LEXIS 146 (Suffolk Super. Ct. June 16, 2011), a Superior Court decision that was issued in June but just recently reported, the Court entered summary judgment against the plaintiffs on their Chapter 93A claim against the defendant insurance advisers and attorneys relating to allegedly defective estate plans

Rochalski v. Sklodowski

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 11 2012

In Rochalski v. Sklodowski, Case No. 10-P-1750, 2012 Mass. App. Unpub. LEXIS 12 (Jan. 6, 2012), a decision issued pursuant to Rule 1:28, the Appeals Court affirmed the probate court's judgment voiding certain transactions on grounds of lack of capacity and undue influence

IRS issues DOMA guidance: action steps for employers

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 5 2013

On August 29, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 providing guidance on the effect of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision

IRS issues DOMA guidance

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2013

On August 29, 2013, the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 (the “Revenue Ruling”) providing guidance on the effect of the

New Year's resolution -- make sure your estate plan reflects your wishes

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 17 2013

With the start of a new year and the enactment of a new federal law that will affect estate planning in a variety of ways, now is the time to review

10 tips for outsourcing document reviews to offshore vendors

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2010

Legal departments are increasingly using contract attorneys to conduct document reviews during discovery

Donoghue v. Horner

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 28 2009

Case law relating to trusts and estates is constantly evolving

Agreement for “direct use immunity” did not preclude federal prosecutors from sharing defendant’s incriminating proffer statements with foreign (or state) authorities

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • France, USA
  • -
  • June 23 2009

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed that a criminal defendant’s agreement with federal prosecutors not to use against him any statements made by him during proffer sessions did not bar the U.S. Attorney’s Office from sharing his incriminating statements with authorities in France who then used the statements against him in French criminal proceedings

Lowery v. RESCA

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 18 2009

Case law relating to trusts and estates is constantly evolving

Rostanzo v. Rostanzo

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 2 2009

In Rostanzo v. Rostanzo, Case No. 06-P-1953, 2009 Mass. App. LEXIS 100 (Jan. 29, 2009), the Appeals Court addressed the enforceability of an antenuptial agreement and the validity of a will