We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 11-20 of 40

Donoghue v. Horner

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 28 2009

Case law relating to trusts and estates is constantly evolving

Heavey v. Maloof

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 24 2009

In Heavey v. Maloof, Case No. SJC-10290 (Feb. 20, 2009), the Supreme Judicial Court addressed statute of limitations questions under G.L. 230, 5

Connecticut's proposed rule on registration of in-house counsel due for vote of judges

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 25 2007

With all the things that a Connecticut company's in-house counsel has to worry about, being accused of practicing law without a license should not be one of them

Connecticut Authorized House Counsel registration procedure

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 12 2007

Subsequent to our September 6-7 Briefings on the new Connecticut Rule 2-15A on registration of Authorized House Counsel (AHC), we have obtained the following new information of importance

Agreement for “direct use immunity” did not preclude federal prosecutors from sharing defendant’s incriminating proffer statements with foreign (or state) authorities

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • France, USA
  • -
  • June 23 2009

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed that a criminal defendant’s agreement with federal prosecutors not to use against him any statements made by him during proffer sessions did not bar the U.S. Attorney’s Office from sharing his incriminating statements with authorities in France who then used the statements against him in French criminal proceedings

D'ambrosio v Milgroom

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 5 2009

Three decisions issued last week by the Appeals Court pursuant to Rule 1:28 are worth mentioning

Authorized House Counsel: Connecticut’s official registration application form

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 14 2007

The official application form for registration as Authorized House Counsel in Connecticut is now available on the website of the Connecticut Bar Examining Committee (CBEC

New Subsection (9) of Rule 4:02 of the Supreme Judicial Court rules, effective June 1, 2008, requires Massachusetts in-house lawyers not admitted to the bar of the Commonwealth to register with the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 26 2008

In December, 2006, the Supreme Judicial Court adopted Rule 5.5 of the American Bar Association’s Model Rules of Professional Conduct, conferring formal legitimacy and peace of mind on many Massachusetts in-house lawyers who are not admitted to the Massachusetts bar

10 tips for outsourcing document reviews to offshore vendors

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2010

Legal departments are increasingly using contract attorneys to conduct document reviews during discovery

New York Supreme Court issues a defense verdict for Day Pitney client

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 3 2010

On July 29, 2009, Supreme Court Judge Nicholas Colabella of the New York Supreme Court in Westchester County issued a defense verdict for our client, Volkswagen Group of America, in a wrongful death case that had been pending since 1997