We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 3,742

Be careful what you put in your e-mail

  • Loeb & Loeb LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 17 2013

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York recently held, in connection with a criminal prosecution, that information a

Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal allows transsexual woman to marry man

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • Hong Kong
  • -
  • May 16 2013

Hong Kong's Court of Final Appeal (CFA) recently addressed the question: Who is a 'woman' for the purpose of marriage? The landmark case is W v. The

Last minute amendment by counsel to augment fee claim rejected by court

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 15 2013

In Duchrow v. Forrest, 2013 DJAR 5534 (2013) the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District decided a unique fee claim arising in a

Judicial assessment of experts

  • 1 Chancery Lane
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 15 2013

Fancy some feedback? The criminal Bar is having to come to terms with the prospect of barristers being formally assessed every year by the judiciary

Fixed fee family law services

  • Ashton KCJ
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 15 2013

You may have seen the news coverage in recent months about a report by the Legal Ombudsman for England and Wales which highlighted the high fees

Sanctions are issued where court determines that special motion to strike was filed for improper purpose

  • Barger & Wolen LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

In Kleveland v. Siegel & Wolensky LLP, 2013 DAR 4961(2013) the California Courts of Appeal for the Fourth Appellate District affirmed the denial of a

Evidence of undue influence in Kentucky

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

A common theme here is that undue influence cases tend to be very fact specific. Last month, in Mays v. Porter, the Kentucky Court of Appeals gave us

Child seat restraints and contributory fault in road traffic compensation claims

  • Anthony Gold Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 14 2013

The insurers of a mother of a three year old who was seriously injured in a car accident have been ordered to pay 25 of her daughter's compensation

Proposed family law legislation prohibiting foreign laws fails to pass in Florida Senate

  • Bilzin Sumberg Baena Price & Axelrod LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

In a previous post, I discussed Senate Bill 58 and House Bill 351, which were proposed bills that would have prohibited the application of foreign

Warrantless cell phone searches a look at the case law

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

When a person is arrested with a cell phone, law enforcement officers will likely want to search the phone's contents. Today's smart phones are a