We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,645

L’obligation d’un franchiseur d’agir de bonne foi et les obligations implicites qui en découlent : Dunkin’ Donuts condamné à payer près de 18 M$ à certains de ses franchisés

  • Lavery de Billy LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 23 2015

La Cour d’appel du Québec a rendu un important jugement concernant les obligations tacites des franchiseurs envers leurs franchisés. En juin 2012, la

Israel - three new tenders for government-sponsored technological incubators

  • Herzog Fox & Neeman
  • -
  • Israel
  • -
  • April 22 2015

The Office of the Chief Scientist of the Israeli Ministry of Economy ("OCS") has recently published three new tenders for franchises to form and

Franchisors’ duty to act in good faith and related implicit obligations: Dunkin’ Donuts ordered to pay nearly $18M to some of its franchisees

  • Lavery de Billy LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 22 2015

The Court of Appeal of Quebec has issued an important judgment pertaining to a franchisor's implicit obligations towards its franchisees. In June

Rail franchise for sale one previous owner

  • Clyde & Co LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 22 2015

Purchasing a business can be done in two ways. The first is for the purchaser to buy the shares in the company which runs the business and acquire

The strange case of the bank that told the truth

  • MARQUE Lawyers
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 21 2015

A bunch of angry franchisees has lost its fight against the Bank of Queensland (BOQ) over claims they were deceived into buying their BOQ franchises

Court to feuding franchisor: take down that blog post!

  • Allens
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • April 21 2015

The recent Madden v Seafolly appeal sent a very clear warning to business owners about spruiking their own businesses or taking down the competition

Québec Court of Appeal upholds liability, reduces damages in Dunkin' Brands Canada Ltd. v. Bertico Inc.

  • Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 17 2015

The Québec Court of Appeal has issued its reasons in the appeal of a trial decision awarding $16M in damages to former Dunkin’ Donuts franchisees. In

Québec Court of Appeal upholds finding of franchisor’s obligation to maintain brand strength

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 17 2015

In a highly anticipated decision released on April 15, 2015, the Québec Court of Appeal upheld the findings of Justice Tingley of the Québec Superior

Québec Court of Appeal recognizes implied obligations in franchise agreement: what does this really mean?

  • McCarthy Tétrault LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 17 2015

The Québec Court of Appeal has recently released its long awaited decision in Dunkin’ Brands Canada Ltd. c. Bertico Inc., 2015 QCCA 624 reading into

Historic Court of Appeal decision in Dunkin’ Brands: three lessons for franchisors

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • April 16 2015

After a 12-year legal saga, the Quebec Court of Appeal has upheld a trial Court's decision and ordered the franchisor Dunkin' Brands to pay millions