Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,054

Franchisees who faked evidence in court case permitted to continue litigating

Armstrong Teasdale LLP
-
USA
-
May 15 2013

It should be obvious to anyone reading these words that it is never a good idea to lie to a court of law. That's a pretty basic concept, right? Lying

Disclosure is compulsory

Adams & Adams
-
South Africa
-
May 9 2013

Despite the fact that the Consumer Protection Act (“CPA”) came into operation on or about 1 April 2011, there are still numerous franchisors who have

Intra-class debate permissible during opt-out period: 1250264 Ontario Inc v Pet Valu Canada Inc

Bennett Jones LLP
-
Canada
-
May 7 2013

On May 3, 2013, the Ontario Court of Appeal released its decision in 1250264 Ontario Inc v Pet Valu Canada Inc, which addresses the propriety of

Reach of New Jersey Franchise Practices Act continues to expand

McCarter & English LLP
-
Jersey, USA
-
May 7 2013

On March 13, 2013, the United States District Court, District of New Jersey, in Strassle v. Bimbo Foods Bakeries Distrib., Inc., No. 12-3313 (Mar. 13

When are a franchisor's financial performance representations actionable?

Armstrong Teasdale LLP
-
USA
-
May 7 2013

Under the FTC's Franchise Rule, a franchisor is permitted, but not required, to answer that all-important question asked by would-be franchise

Ontario Court of Appeal provides guidance on the definition of "franchisor’s associate"

McCarthy Tétrault LLP
-
Canada
-
May 6 2013

A recent decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario (ONCA) helps define the concept of "control," as it relates to the definition of a "franchisor's

Propcos e-briefing: a recent case on enfranchisement

Eversheds LLP
-
United Kingdom
-
May 2 2013

The case of Day v Hosebay Limited gave welcome guidance to the approach to the question "what is a house" for the purposes of the Leasehold Reform

Plain language is important

Roetzel & Andress
-
USA
-
May 2 2013

In H&R Block Tax Services v. Franklin, the Court of Appeals concluded (over a strong dissent) that H&R Block had the right to terminate two franchise

Franchising bill moves forward in California

Armstrong Teasdale LLP
-
USA
-
May 1 2013

An update to my previous post regarding the "fair franchising bill" being considered in California's Senate: on Tuesday, April 16, 2013, the

The dishonest lawyer: a cautionary tale for all solicitors and their clients

Buddle Findlay
-
New Zealand
-
May 1 2013

The High Court case of Cityside Asset Pty Ltd v 1 Solution Ltd 2012 NZHC 1382 involved a breach of a franchise agreement following its termination

next >

Search results

Franchisees who faked evidence in court case permitted to continue litigating

Disclosure is compulsory

Intra-class debate permissible during opt-out period: 1250264 Ontario Inc v Pet Valu Canada Inc

Reach of New Jersey Franchise Practices Act continues to expand

When are a franchisor's financial performance representations actionable?

Ontario Court of Appeal provides guidance on the definition of "franchisor’s associate"

Propcos e-briefing: a recent case on enfranchisement

Plain language is important

Franchising bill moves forward in California

The dishonest lawyer: a cautionary tale for all solicitors and their clients

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea