We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,341

Le distributeur en fin de contrat n’a pas droit a une indemnite de clientele sur l’invocation d’un enrichissement sans cause (Cour de Cassation, chambre commerciale, 23 Octobre 2012, nº 11.21978)

  • Cuatrecasas Gonçalves Pereira
  • -
  • France
  • -
  • February 28 2013

Six contrats de franchise comportant une clause de non-concurrence post-contractuelle ont été conclus entre deux sociétés. Toutefois, le franchiseur a

Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act preparing for January 1, 2012

  • Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • March 7 2011

As of January 1, 2012, all employers in Ontario who provide goods and services must be compliant with the Accessibility Standards for Customer Service (the Customer Service Standards) issued under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (the AODA

Court holds franchisees in contempt but finds franchisor failed to prove franchisees were violating noncompete

  • Gray Plant Mooty
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 18 2012

In JTH Tax, Inc. v. Noor, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138657 (E.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2012), the franchisor filed a motion for contempt against the terminated franchisees for violating a default judgment order that, in part, enjoined the franchisees from operating a tax preparation business in violation of the franchise agreement’s noncompete provision and required the franchisees to return certain information and materials belonging to the franchisor

Settlement over false halel ads for McDonald’s chicken approved

  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 19 2013

According to a news source, a Michigan state court has approved a settlement of claims that a McDonald's franchisee falsely advertised some of its

So your dealer has closed its doors -- now what?

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 13 2008

In the current economic climate, many dealers are shutting down all or part of a dealership without warning

Franchising legislation amendments announced

  • Hall & Wilcox
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 4 2010

The Federal Government yesterday released the amendments to the Franchising Code of Conduct (Code

Vicarious liability - like pizza - is a dish best served cold

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 29 2012

By now, employers seem to understand their obligation to keep their employees from committing sexual harassment

Franchisee who ignored his disclosure document loses lawsuit

  • Armstrong Teasdale LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 29 2013

A franchisee who sued his franchisor for fraud learned the hard way why it's important to read the Franchise Disclosure Document, cover to cover

Successful trademark plaintiff awarded its attorney's fees pursuant to a franchise agreement

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 4 2012

Judge Dow awarded plaintiffs (collectively "Quizno's") their attorney's fees of approximately $28k in this franchise and trademark case involving Quizno's restaurants

Ontario Court of Appeal confirms limitation period for rescission actions under Ontario’s franchise legislation

  • Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • July 12 2012

The Ontario Court of Appeal recently heard an appeal of a decision Cassels discussed in its February 2012 e-Communique, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in 2130489 Ontario Inc. v. Philthy McNasty’s (Enterprises) Inc. (2011 ONSC 6852