We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-3 of 3

What matters: A review of 2011 and 2012

  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

As you know, the last two years have seen a somewhat improved, but by no means robust, business climate. At the same time, structural shifts in the

Recent court decision holds that neither SEQRA nor CEQR require a lead agency to consider aggregate potential environmental impacts from potential future rezonings

  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 28 2012

In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court, New York County, held that neither the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”) nor the City Environmental Quality Review (“CEQR”) require a lead agency to consider aggregate potential environmental impacts from possible future zoning changes when evaluating a discrete, small-scale zoning change

Dismissal of amended complaint in Gifford et al. v. USGBC leaves substantive issues unresolved

  • Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 20 2011

The U.S. Green Building Council (“USGBC”) and its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (“LEED”) program recently scored a victory in the case of Gifford et al. v. U.S. Green Building Council et al