Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 168

Do liability policies, particularly pollution liability insurance policies, exclude coverage for all injunctions? The Fifth Circuit says no

Foley Hoag LLP
-
USA
-
May 22 2013

The Fifth Circuit handed down an important decision last week, Louisiana Generating LLC v. Illinois Union Insurance Company, clarifying the scope of

Louisiana court finds settlement of environmental enforcement actions triggers insurance coverage

Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
-
USA
-
April 26 2013

The Louisiana Court of Appeals has ruled that a commercial pollution legal liability policy covered at least some costs to be incurred in connection

Ninth Circuit narrows insurers' options in pursuing subrogation claims under CERCLA

Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
-
USA
-
April 18 2013

The Ninth Circuit confirmed that Chubb could have maintained a subrogation action against potentially liable parties if its insured had made a written

Missouri court applies “all sums” allocation to long-tail environmental coverage dispute

Neal Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
-
USA
-
April 15 2013

The court in Doe Run Resources Corporation v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, No. ED98086, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 468 (April 16, 2013), held

Oklahoma court addresses time element pollution exclusion

Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
-
USA
-
April 3 2013

In its recent decision in Colony Insurance Company v. Bear Products, Inc., 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 43716 (E.D. Okl. Mar. 26, 2013), the United States

District court judge confirms summary judgment victory for policyholder regarding the duty to defend and the pollution exclusion

Reed Smith LLP
-
USA
-
April 2 2013

In January, we reported on developments in Wiseman Oil Co. v. TIG Insurance, a case pending in the United States District Court for the Western

Words matter settlement agreements should be enforced as written

Foley Hoag LLP
-
USA
-
April 2 2013

Sometimes you read a decision and it's hard to understand how there really were two plausible sides to the dispute. Arrowood Indemnity Company v The

Court requires insurer to defend CERCLA lawsuit

Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
-
USA
-
March 29 2013

A federal court in Pennsylvania has held that an insurer which insured an oil company from 1972 to 1982 was required to defend a case brought by the

Insurer unable to step into CERCLA shoes of insured

Jenner & Block
-
USA
-
March 28 2013

A recent Ninth Circuit decision limited the ability of an insurer to seek CERCLA contribution andor cost recovery from potentially responsible

Too much of a good thing: household product triggers pollution exclusion, because "quantity matters"

Jorden Burt LLP
-
USA
-
March 22 2013

Pollution exclusion clauses began appearing in commercial general liability policies when federal laws began making businesses liable for the cost of

next >

Search results

Do liability policies, particularly pollution liability insurance policies, exclude coverage for all injunctions? The Fifth Circuit says no

Louisiana court finds settlement of environmental enforcement actions triggers insurance coverage

Ninth Circuit narrows insurers' options in pursuing subrogation claims under CERCLA

Missouri court applies “all sums” allocation to long-tail environmental coverage dispute

Oklahoma court addresses time element pollution exclusion

District court judge confirms summary judgment victory for policyholder regarding the duty to defend and the pollution exclusion

Words matter settlement agreements should be enforced as written

Court requires insurer to defend CERCLA lawsuit

Insurer unable to step into CERCLA shoes of insured

Too much of a good thing: household product triggers pollution exclusion, because "quantity matters"

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea