We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 252

Ohio Court weighs in on CERCLA contributioncost recovery debate

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 14 2013

On February 8, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio issued its decision in Hobart Corporation v. Waste Management of Ohio

Ohio Supreme Court clarifies air pollution penalty calculation

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 7 2012

On December 6, 2012, the Ohio Supreme Court issued its widely anticipated decision in State ex rel. Ohio Attorney General v. Shelly Holding Co

Columbus expands Green Columbus Fund to include multifamily housing

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 3 2012

Columbus City Council approved an ordinance yesterday that expands the Green Columbus Fund beyond commercial LEED-certified building projects, which will enable builders to receive a 25 percent reimbursement for “construction of central city energy efficient apartments and condominiums,” according to a press release from Get Green Columbus

Clean Ohio proposes changes in an effort to streamline funding for brownfield projects

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 24 2012

Recently, the Clean Ohio Council proposed a major program overhaul to the Clean Ohio Fund

U.S. EPA and the rule of three: two is a coincidence, three is a trend

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 31 2012

In a trio of recent decisions, several federal circuit courts of appeal are holding U.S. EPA in check on an expansive view of its regulatory powers

Legislative task force readies reports on use of anaerobic digesters

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 16 2012

A legislative panel is preparing two reports on the use of anaerobic digesters in Ohio that could lead to legislative and regulatory changes to promote the technology

Legislative task force readies reports on use of anaerobic digesters

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 9 2012

A legislative task force is preparing two studies on the use of anaerobic digesters in Ohio

Ohio School Facilities Commission proposes rule for "solar ready" schools

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 5 2012

The Ohio School Facilities Commission ("OSFC") has released a proposed rule regarding the adoption of standards for "solar ready" school roofs

Sierra Club v. Korleski and the Ohio Best Available Technology rule: wine turned into vinegar for the Sierra Club

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 28 2012

In dramatic fashion, on May 25, 2012 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reinstated the ten-ton Best Available Technology (“BAT”) rule which permits the Director of Ohio EPA to issue permits to smaller emission sources that produce less than ten tons of emissions per year without first determining whether those sources will employ BAT

Clean Ohio program update

  • Bricker & Eckler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 22 2012

Our May 17 blog post discussed the potential appropriation by the Senate Finance Committee that would allow for the issuance of up to $42 million in bonds to further fund the Clean Ohio program’s participation in farmland preservation and green space projects around the state

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy