We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 225

Wondering about the status of EPA's CCR rule? So are 11 environmental groups

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 10 2012

EPA published two separate proposals for regulating coal ash one under Subtitle C and one under Subtitle D on June 21, 2010

An example of true judicial restraint: Judge Robert Chambers affirms the Highland Mining 404 permit

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 17 2012

After my post on judicial restraint and the lack thereof in Texas v. EPA, the opinion issued last week by Judge Robert Chambers, in Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, affirming the Corps’ 404 permit for Highland Mining’s Reylas Surface Mine, seemed particularly notable

EPA splits the baby on backup generators: still allows 100 hours use, but now requires ultra low sulfur diesel

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2013

Yesterday, EPA finalized revisions to the National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for stationary reciprocating internal combustion

Is CO2 a regulated pollutant under the Clean Air Act? Not yet, at least in Georgia

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 10 2009

Earlier this week, the Georgia Court of Appeals reversed a decision of the Superior Court in Georgia that would have required Longleaf Energy Associates, developer of a coal-fired power plant, to perform a BACT analysis of CO2 emissions control technologies in order to obtain an air quality permit for construction of the plant

New York joins the bandwagon: incorporating GHG analysis into reviews of new project development

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2009

As most readers know, Massachusetts and California have been leading the pack in requiring analysis of greenhouse gas impacts in connection with reviews of new development

National cap-and-trade legislation passes the House: at 1,428 pages, nearly something for everyone

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 1 2009

The narrow passage by the House of Representatives of H.R. 2454, the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, by a vote of 219-212 on Friday, June 26, marks the first time that major legislation on global warming has passed either house of Congress

Nanotechnology and site remediation: is the promise beginning to come to fruition?

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 14 2009

As a confirmed optimist and believer in technology, I’ve long thought that we can meet the challenge posed by global climate change as long as we implement the right policies to provide incentives to develop the necessary technologies

D.C. Circuit remands Phase 2 ozone rule: another defeat for cap and trade programs

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 13 2009

Last Friday, in NRDC v. EPA, the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit struck down parts of EPA’s Phase 2 rule for achieving compliance with the ozone NAAQS

EPA Region I still not idle on the anti-idling front: yet another six-figure penalty

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 4 2009

EPA announced today that it had reached yet another six-figure penalty settlement in an anti-idling case

Stormwater discharges from construction activity: what next from EPA?

  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 7 2009

Construction and development companies praying for an economic recovery next year have something else to worry about: pending new EPA regulations regarding stormwater discharges from construction activities and claims from environmental groups that EPA’s proposal isn’t stringent enough