We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-5 of 5

Antitrust

  • Squire Sanders Hammonds
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 10 2011

The Commission has opened two investigations relating to possible breaches of Articles 101 and 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (the TFEU) in the credit default swaps (CDS) market

The Jones Act - one more variable in the offshore wind equation

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 13 2010

Of the many pieces to the offshore wind puzzle for the United States, the Jones Act and other statutory requirements concerning installation and maintenance vessels for an offshore wind farm create uncertainties that can dramatically effect project planning, completion and financing

US Customs and Border Protection ruling may exempt foreign offshore wind farm turbine-installation vessels from Jones Act regulation

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 23 2010

In response to an inquiry from an East Coast wind project, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) recently published a May 27, 2010 ruling exempting foreign flag vessels and crews from the Jones Act when drilling, driving piles and installing wind towers in offshore wind projects

Recent developments in nuclear transportation

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 16 2010

New regulations have been brought into force which are bound to present challenges for both the industry and the regulators requiring intuitive solutions to the issues surrounding moving dangerous substances from A to B

Enron Coal Services Limited (in liquidation) v English, Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited

  • Squire Sanders
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 16 2009

A claim brought by Enron Coal Services Limited (ECSL) has been allowed to continue despite English, Welsh and Scottish Railway Limited (EWS) petitioning the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) to strike out their claim on the grounds of rule 40 of the Tribunal Rules

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy