We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-7 of 7

Using conviction records as a screening tool

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 1 2012

The retail industry is beset by shrink both from internal and external sources

Lawsuit serves up lessons for restaurateurs

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 1 2011

A decision issued this summer by a federal district court in New York provides important lessons for professionals in the food services and restaurant industry regarding employee defection and trade secrets issues

Credit checks in California now tougher than ever

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2011

Effective January 1, 2012, California employers will have to avoid yet another potential legal hazard that haunts businesses with the threat of costly penalties: the unauthorized use of consumer credit reports regarding job applicants and current employees

An intoxicating trade secret: Sam Adams versus Anchor Steam

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 28 2011

Describing itself as doing business in the “Better Beer” part of the beer market, Boston Beer Corporation the maker of Sam Adams beers filed a lawsuit yesterday against competitors Anchor Brewing Company and Anchor Brewers & Distillers the maker of Anchor Steam beers as well as Judd Hausner

Ninth Circuit reverses course on Computer Fraud & Abuse Act

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2011

More often than not when a management law firm informs its clients of recent case developments, the news is not good

Ninth Circuit rules for employers in protecting trade secrets

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 12 2011

More often than not when a management law firm informs its clients of recent case developments, the news is not good

State Supreme Court clarifies the definition of "employ"

  • Fisher & Phillips LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 21 2010

Recently the California Supreme Court held that third-party merchants were not "employers" as defined by the Industrial Welfare Commission, in part because they did not control the conditions of employment for the subject agricultural employees (strawberry pickers), i.e., did not hire them, fire them, or even have a right to tell them what to do or direct their work

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy