Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-6 of 6
Civil service redundancy payments to be capped
- Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- August 13 2010
The Government has "reluctantly" announced that it will legislate as soon as possible to cap redundancy pay for civil servants, bringing packages into line with best practice in the private sector
Employee in breach of implied duty of trust and confidence cannot claim constructive dismissal
- Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- March 11 2010
The EAT has held, in the case of Aberdeen City Council v McNeill, that an employee, who at the time of their resignation is themselves in breach of the implied duty of trust and confidence, is not entitled to claim constructive dismissal on the basis of the employer's breach of trust and confidence
Reasonable adjustments swapping jobs
- Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- June 11 2010
In the recent case of Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police v Jelic, the EAT held that a reasonable adjustment for the purposes of the Disability Discrimination Act can include swapping the job of a disabled employee with that of another employee
GEO publishes guidance on new public sector duties
- Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- February 11 2010
The Government Equalities Office ("GEO") has published guidance on the new public-sector duty to reduce socio-economic inequalities contained in the Equality Bill
EAT decision on combined indirect sex and race discrimination
- Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- November 17 2009
In Ministry of Defence v DeBique, the EAT upheld a tribunal's decision that a female soldier from a Commonwealth country, who was also a single parent, was indirectly discriminated against on the grounds of sex and race
Age discriminatory pay protection always potentially justifiable
- Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
- -
- United Kingdom
- -
- November 12 2009
In Pulham v London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, the EAT has held that, unlike the position in relation to sex discrimination and equal pay, pay protection arrangements that discriminate on the basis of age are always potentially justifiable
