We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 371

Pending appeal does not change TUPE status of employee

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 23 2013

The EAT has recently explored what happens when an appeal against a non TUPE-related dismissal is outstanding at the date of the relevant transfer

Getting it right when letting people go

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 15 2013

The main issue in Société Générale v Geys was precisely when Mr Geys’ contract of employment had been terminated. If it had been brought to an end

Europe delivers verdict on UK religious discrimination law

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 15 2013

Earlier this year the European Court of Human Rights ruled on four claims against the UK Government brought under Article 9 of the Convention. Ms

Moves to plug whistleblowing loopholes

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 15 2013

Protection for whistleblowers was first introduced by the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998. Despite its title, this Act does not explicitly require

EAT restores protection against post-employment victimisation

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 9 2013

It was perhaps a coincidence that the EAT President chose international labour day to announce a decision that restores protection for workers

Just who is an affected employee in a TUPE transfer?

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 7 2013

Where there is a relevant transfer under TUPE, a transferor is obliged to inform and, in certain circumstances, consult with appropriate

New criminal sanctions: will they generate the cultural change required for a safer NHS? Examining the Government’s initial response to the Francis Report

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 2 2013

The Government has accepted some, but not all, of the recommendations made by Robert Francis QC to introduce new criminal law sanctions. While the

Volunteers and protection from discrimination

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 10 2013

A recent decision of the Supreme Court in X v Mid Sussex CAB has established that volunteers without a legally binding contract are not protected by

Administrator’s pre-transfer dismissals automatically unfair

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 4 2013

One key concern when buying a business in administration is whether a buyer will inherit liabilities arising from pre-transfer dismissals made by

Obesity is not a “disability” but side-effects might be

  • Mills & Reeve LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 2 2013

Under both the Equality Act 2010 and its predecessor, the Disability Discrimination Act 1995, a person is disabled if he or she has a physical or