We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 1,347

NLRB, ignoring criticism from the Courts, overrules Planned Building Services in Pressroom Cleaners

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 14 2014

A Board Majority has used Pressroom Cleaners, 361 NLRB No. 57 (September 30, 2014) to overrule Planned Building Services, 347 NLRB 670 (2006), a

CVS prevails in first round on TKO

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2014

The federal district court in Chicago last week issued its much-awaited opinion in EEOC v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., No. 1-14-cv-00863 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 7

Not impressed by the chutzpah: Court refuses to bless the EEOC’s attempt to create a new form of pattern or practice litigation

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2014

Judge John Darrah of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued a decision this week in the EEOC's landmark case against

Court bucks notion that there is nationwide jurisdiction if the EEOC sues under Title VII

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 10 2014

On September 22, 2014, in EEOC v. Vicksburg Healthcare LLC, et al., Case No. 3:13-CV-895 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 22, 2014), Judge Keith Starrett the U.S

What does the employer know, and when does it know it? SCOTUS grants cert in EEOC v. Abercrombie religious discrimination suit

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 9 2014

On October 2, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to weigh in on the long-running litigation between EEOC and Abercrombie & Fitch over the retailer's

Of grapefruits, drug tests and security screening: Supreme Court hears oral argument in Integrity Staffing Solutions v. Busk

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 9 2014

What do grapefruits, drug tests, and security screening have in common? The Justices of the Supreme Court discussed all three during oral argument

When do employers get a break from meal period rules?

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 8 2014

Over the past decade, plaintiffs have filed hundreds of class actions alleging that California employers have failed to "provide" meal breaks. The

The EEOC’s litigation scorecard for FY2014 what does it mean for employers

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 7 2014

The EEOC's fiscal year ended on September 30, 2014. So what did the EEOC's litigation record look like for the past year? Our analysis is here, along

When “the end” is not “the end”: asserting trade secret claims after the execution of a mutual release

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 3 2014

In many cases, the execution of a mutual release is often the last step in resolving a trade secret or non-compete case. Typically included in the

Court denies class certification in race discrimination case against the Fed

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 3 2014

After Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011), class action litigants are re-booting their theories in employment discrimination class