We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 147

Round-up of UK employment law developments in April 2013

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 9 2013

Employers may need to distance themselves from discriminatory remarks made by shareholders who are closely connected to or wield influence over the

Court of Appeal upholds bonus ruling in Dresdner v Attrill

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 29 2013

The Court of Appeal has dismissed an appeal from the High Court's ruling that Dresdner Kleinwort had contractually committed to a minimum bonus pool

Round-up of UK employment law developments in November 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • December 11 2012

UK law may need to be amended to protect employees from dismissal because of their political beliefs or affiliation

Round-up of UK employment law developments October 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 6 2012

Employers could face a substantial increase in historic equal pay claims

Banker's bonuses: ex-Dresdner bankers secure bonus victory based on oral promise at staff meeting

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 10 2012

Financial institutions are well aware of the need for bonus schemes to be drafted very carefully to ensure discretions are not fettered unintentionally

Round-up of employment law developments in April 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 1 2012

In Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes the Supreme Court has confirmed that employers need to give careful consideration when seeking to justify mandatory retirement ages

Round-up of employment law developments in March 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 3 2012

Employers must establish some legitimate reason other than saving costs in order to justify discrimination

Round-up of employment law developments in February 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 5 2012

Employees who live in Britain and commute to work abroad may have unfair dismissal rights in Britain, particularly if the employment contract is governed by British employment law and the employee has been reassured that he will retain British employment law rights

Supreme Court rules on unfair dismissal rights for international commuters

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 9 2012

Employees who live in Britain and commute to work abroad may have unfair dismissal rights in Britain, particularly if the employment contract is governed by British employment law and the employee has been reassured that he will retain British employment law rights

Round-up of employment law developments in December 2011

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 6 2012

This e-bulletin includes short summaries of the following recent developments