Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 34

Mediating non-compete disputes in the medical device industry

Fisher & Phillips LLP
-
USA
-
March 17 2013

The medical device industry remains a hotbed for non-compete litigation, and the reason is plain and simple. Economic justification. Sales reps

Independent contractor or employee?

Fisher & Phillips LLP
-
USA
-
May 1 2012

A perennial issue for businesses both in and out of the healthcare industry is the classification of individuals as independent contractors or employees

Are you ready to accommodate nursing mothers?

Fisher & Phillips LLP
-
USA
-
March 11 2013

As the result of a little-noticed amendment contained in 2010's Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the federal Fair Labor Standards Act's

Unions continue healthcare organizing efforts with wins in Texas

Fisher & Phillips LLP
-
USA
-
August 3 2010

Despite losing some steam in its push for the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA), Big Labor continues intensive efforts to flex its muscles in the healthcare industry

NLRB continues to set sights on healthcare employers

Fisher & Phillips LLP
-
USA
-
November 1 2012

The National Labor Relations Board has continued its aggressive attack on employers in the healthcare industry and nonunion employers generally

Arizona's new legislative prescription for employer medical marijuana ailments

Fisher & Phillips LLP
-
USA
-
May 2 2011

Employers in Arizona exhaled a sigh of relief as Governor Jan Brewer signed a new law Friday, April 29, 2011

Healthcare reform changes affecting coverage of children

Fisher & Phillips LLP
-
USA
-
August 3 2010

The recent health care reform legislation made two significant changes regarding health benefits provided to an employee's adult child

Oregon employers claim victory in medical marijuana battle

Fisher & Phillips LLP
-
USA
-
April 15 2010

On April 15, 2010 the Oregon Supreme Court handed employers a comprehensive victory in the long-running medical marijuana battle, deciding that employers need not accommodate an employee's use of medical marijuana