We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 155

The EEOC has been a busy bee this week. (it stings!)

  • Constangy Brooks & Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 19 2014

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has been on a tear this week, suing employers right and left, and getting some "wins" including a couple

Court slams the brakes on “Black Car” drivers’ misclassification case

  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 18 2014

Trying to catch a cab in New York City is not for the faint of heart. In addition to the traditional "yellow cabs," which often treat the city

NLRB pushing for a joint employer liability model for franchisors?

  • Akerman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 17 2014

In a move that has caused great concern in the franchising industry, in pending cases filed by employees against McDonald's franchisees, the National

Do you know what the National Labor Relations Board considers unlawful these days? Take this pop quiz

  • Much Shelist PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 16 2014

Consider the following scenarios. Then answer whether you think the employer conduct involved is lawful or not lawful: After an unsuccessful union

Retailer's recap

  • Constangy Brooks & Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 15 2014

Retailers, as well as other employers, have grown to rely on payroll cards to compensate employees who may not have bank accounts. What are the legal

NLRB forces restaurant to allow posters insinuating germ-infested food

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 11 2014

The NLRB's ruling in Miklin Enterprises, Inc. dba Jimmy John's is based on section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which guarantees

The answer to the simple question, “who are my employees,” may not be simple when operations occur through intermediaries: the “joint employer” issue

  • Berger Singerman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 10 2014

As businesses seek to generate revenue and mitigate risk, they must ask the simple question "who are my employees" and proceed with awareness that

Protecting the employer's brand during a labor dispute

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 9 2014

The NLRB makes it hard to protect a company's investment, which can be substantial, in its brand. A recent decision demonstrates the perils that

Franchisor not liable for sexual harassment claims asserted by franchisee's employee, California high court rules

  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 9 2014

A franchisor could not be held vicariously liable under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act ("FEHA") for alleged sexual harassment in the

House panel discusses potential revision to joint employer standard

  • Littler Mendelson
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 9 2014

A congressional subcommittee examined the merits and impact of the potential for franchisees and franchisors to be jointly responsible in cases