We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 29,718

Recent legal decisions prove that your Experience Modification Rate matters more than ever

  • Snell & Wilmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2014

Some contractors no doubt experienced sticker shock when their most recent workers' compensation audit came back with a higher-than-expected

How to protect your summary judgment win: employer’s victory reversed in age bias case

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2014

Motions for summary judgment are among the most important and efficient devices for defeating a discrimination suit brought by an employee against an

That persnickety and persistent NLRB

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2014

As has been reported in previous editions of the Health Law Update, National Labor Relations Board (NLRB)-watching now is a required activity for all

As if employers needed another reminder, here are 8.4 million more reasons to get the tip credit right

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 9 2014

A couple of weeks ago, a Philadelphia based sports bar chain entered into a consent order with the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and filed a request

Taylor v. Nabors drilling and California’s SB 292 clarify that sexual harassment need not be motivated by sexual desire

  • Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2014

On January 13, 2014, the California Court of Appeal decided in Taylor v. Nabors Drilling USA, L.P., 222 Cal. App. 4th 1228 (2014), that a person may

Indiana Court of Appeals refuses to enforce terms of non-compete agreement

  • Barnes & Thornburg LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 11 2014

A recent decision of the Indiana Court of Appeals could drive a stake through the heart of many employer's non-compete agreements. The case, Clark's

Finally, we know what’s worse between an ax-wielding George Clooney and a litigious nanny

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 10 2014

After much anticipation, the Supreme Court has settled the debate over which is more dangerous - an "ax-wielding" George Clooney or litigious

Can you fire an employee for peeing in a box?

  • Briggs and Morgan
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 6 2014

Maybe not - a federal court in Minnesota recently denied a motion to dismiss against an employee who alleged that the employer denied her request for

EEOC issues new guidance on religious garb and grooming in the workplace

  • Day Pitney LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • March 12 2014

On March 6, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) released additional guidance on religious accommodations under Title VII of the Civil

Title VII conciliation obligation does not affect EEOC's decision to sue employer

  • Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 17 2014

Under Title VII and related civil rights laws, after it determines probable cause for a violation, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission must