We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 492

The challenges of global telecommuters

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Global
  • -
  • September 1 2009

The old adage that "law does not keep up with technology" is nowhere more true than in the ever-evolving world of telework

Alcohol and drug testing in the union context

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 28 2009

Canadian employers who plan to unilaterally impose stiffer drug and alcohol testing requirements on unionized workers should take note of a March 2009 Alberta Court of Appeal decision, United Assn. Of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local 488 v. Bantrel Constructors Co

NLRB’s decisional authority challenged, pending federal labor legislation, and union organizing outcomes for 2008

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 21 2009

In 1947, the Taft-Hartley amendments to the 1935 National Labor Relations Act expanded the number of National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) members from three to five

Employer alert on “swine flu”

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 1 2009

The confirmation that the contagion, "swine flu", is present in Canada, raises potential issues about the rights and responsibilities of both employers and employees

Employer response to pandemic flu warnings

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 1 2009

With the formal notice of a U.S. public health emergency due to reported outbreaks of swine flu in Mexico and in areas of the U.S., employers again face the prospect of dealing with widespread voluntary and involuntary absences that will materially affect their business operations

Influenza - labor law implications

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Mexico
  • -
  • May 1 2009

In light of the sanitary alert and accord issued by the Ministry of Health, published in the official gazette of April 30, 2009 ("Accord"), we would like to alert you that such Accord orders the suspension of labor activities in the public and productive sector from May 1st through May 5th, 2009

New Vacation Act from January 1, 2012

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Netherlands
  • -
  • November 30 2011

The new Vacation Act will enter into force on January 1, 2012

January 1, 2012 AODA compliance deadline: are you ready?

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • January 11 2012

Private sector employers in Ontario must comply with the Customer Service Standards regulation under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2005 (“AODA”) by January 1, 2012

Case shows significance of shift in burden of proof for overtime claims

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • China
  • -
  • February 16 2011

The Zhongshan Intermediate People's Court of Guangdong Province recently dismissed an employee's overtime claim due to the employee's failure to provide evidence that she actually worked overtime

National High Court confirms fine imposed by the Spanish Data Protection Agency on a company for forwarding to its staff a court resolution without deleting personal data contained in the resolution

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Spain
  • -
  • August 31 2010

The National High Court has confirmed a fine of 100,000 imposed by the Spanish Data Protection Agency (SDPA) on a company that forwarded to its employees a link to a court resolution referring to a dispute between the company and one of its employees without erasing the relevant employee's personal data (including sensitive data