Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-5 of 5
"Under pressure" not enough to make agreement unenforceable.
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- May 6 2011
Plaintiff CLP Resources, Inc. (“CLP”), a large provider of temporary construction workers, sued a former employee, defendant Salerno, and his new business, Defendant Alliance Project Staffing (“Alliance”), claiming causes of action for breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets and tortious interference with existing and prospective contracts
Former employee's theft of trade secrets leads to criminal charges and ultimate federal prison sentence.
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- December 28 2010
On December 13, 2010, Kevin Crow was sentenced to serve thirty-six (36) months in Federal prison, without parole, which prison term was to be followed by 3 years' supervised release
"Circumstantial" proof of solicitation found insufficient by District of New Jersey
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 30 2010
Plaintiffs ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company (“ILIAC”) and ING Financial Advisors (“IFA”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs” or “ING”), sought to enjoin defendants, all of whom were former employees of ING, from soliciting clients to withdraw certain accounts from ING, pending the resolution of a FINRA Dispute Resolution Proceeding
Western District of New York upholds non-compete and grants TRO
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- August 24 2010
Plaintiff IDG USA, LLC (“IDG”), a Georgia company with its principal place of business in North Carolina, commenced an action against a former employee, Kevin J. Schupp (“Schupp”), a New York resident, alleging breaches of a Non-Compete Agreement, breach of a Confidentiality Agreement, unfair competition, and theft of trade secrets
Nondisclosure agreement found to fall short without an accompanying non-compete
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 10 2009
In the back and forth battle between companies and former employees regarding the confidential nature of customer information, the United States District Court for the District of Nebraska has just issued a decision of note in Softchoice Corp. v. MacKenzie, 08-cv-00249
