Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-10 of 35
Song-Beverly does not prohibit Apple from collecting personal identification information from iTunes account holders
- Arent Fox LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 28 2013
The Supreme Court of California recently reaffirmed that the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act, California Civil Code 1747.08, does not apply to
California Credit Card Act does not cover internet downloads
- Steptoe & Johnson LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 23 2013
According to the California Supreme Court, when California enacted the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act of 1991 to protect consumers' personal
California Supreme Court rules that Song-Beverly Act does not apply to on-line transactions
- Snell & Wilmer
- -
- USA
- -
- February 23 2013
A little over a year ago, the United States District Court for the Central District of California ruled that California's Song-Beverly Act (the Act
California's Song-Beverly Credit Card Act does not apply to online downloadable purchases
- Venable LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 15 2013
For now, online retailers can rest assured that they are not liable under California's Song-Beverly Credit Card Act if they require customers to
The California Supreme Court holds that the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act does not prohibit retailers from obtaining and recording personal identification information in online transactionsfor purchase of downloadable products
- Seyfarth Shaw LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- February 4 2013
In its second major decision in two years involving the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act - which prohibits retailers from obtaining and recording
Does California's credit card law apply online?
- Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- November 21 2012
The California Supreme Court heard oral argument in a challenge to the state's Song-Beverly Credit Card Act, which limits the collection of personal information when a credit card is used for a purchase
Ohio Supreme Court frowns on constructive notice via website of sheriff's sale
- Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- September 6 2012
On May 17, 2012, this blog reported on the oral arguments in PHH Mortgage v. Prater, a case from Clermont County, Ohio regarding the extent to which an internet website may (or may not) be constitutionally adequate notice of a sheriff’s sale
Bank's "commercially unreasonable" security practices to blame for cyber theft
- Steptoe & Johnson LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 21 2012
The First Circuit earlier this month held that a bank could be liable for the theft of nearly $600,000 from a company’s bank account because the bank’s online security systems were not “commercially reasonable” under the Uniform Commercial Code
Court of Appeals ruling may broaden bank liability for unauthorized internet funds transfers
- Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 16 2012
On July 3, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit overturned a district court ruling and allowed a lawsuit by Patco Construction Co. (“Patco”) to proceed against Peoples United Bank (the “Bank”) over $345,000 that was stolen from Patco’s bank accounts through internet fraud in 2009
Court rules bank's security procedures were not commercially reasonable
- Day Pitney LLP
- -
- USA
- -
- July 13 2012
In an important decision last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held, as a matter of law, that People's United Bank's online banking security procedures were not commercially reasonable, even though its selected authentication technology fully complied with the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) guidelines for Authentication in an Internet Banking Environment
Current Search
Suggested Facets
Author
- Amy L. Pierce (1)
- Anthony V. Lupo (2)
- Daryn A Grossman (2)
- Elizabeth Bohn (1)
- Jeff Neuburger (3)
- Jonathan L. Pompan (1)
- Kristen J Mathews (2)
- Robert E Freeman (2)
- Sally Albertazzie (2)
- Sarah L. Bruno (2)
Firm Name
- Arent Fox LLP (2)
- Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP (2)
- Fenwick & West LLP (1)
- Hogan Lovells (1)
- Jorden Burt LLP (2)
- Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP (4)
- Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP (1)
- Proskauer Rose LLP (3)
- Steptoe & Johnson LLP (2)
- Venable LLP (3)
