We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 114

California Franchise Tax Board’s New Year’s resolution revisit (revise? expand?) special industry and sales factor apportionment regulations

  • Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 10 2008

On January 8 and 9, the California Franchise Tax Board (“FTB”) conducted Interested Parties meetings to discuss certain apportionment regulations focusing on special industries, as well as special rules for applying costs of performance (“COP”) sourcing

FACT or fiction? FACT Act account number truncation requirement applies to electronic receipts

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 4 2008

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida agreed with a consumer that an online retailer’s provision of an electronic receipt that included the full credit card expiration date violated Section 113 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACT Act) (15 U.S.C. 1681c(g)), and thus did not grant the retailer’s motion to dismiss

Credit card companies not liable for copyright infringers’ acts

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 12 2007

In the 1940s, Jehovah’s Witnesses, tenaciously litigious in defense of free expression, generated a half-dozen Supreme Court decisions that came to define First Amendment rights in the Twentieth Century

Financial supermarket? No. Financial advertising supermarket? Well, maybe

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 30 2007

Years ago, a number of companies hoped that by offering to simplify financial record-keeping and collect your financial information in one place, consumers would find it easier than trying to keep track of all of the numbers, codes and IDs they have to contend with in the real world

FDIC releases guidance related to bank security breaches

  • Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 5 2007

In its Winter 2006 edition of Supervisory Insights released on January 3, 2007, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has set forth information related to incident response programs to be utilized when a security breach or data compromise occurs

Security interests in domain names and intellectual property

  • Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 28 2009

In this challenging economy, intellectual property rights are increasingly valuable assets

Bank may have breached duty to protect account by failing to use multi-factor authentication

  • Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 14 2009

A bank that failed to use "multi-factor" authentication (as opposed to only usernames and passwords) may have breached its duty to provide online account security owed to the plaintiff individuals whose home equity line of credit account was breached by a hacker

Banks liable for cyber criminals?

  • Duane Morris LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 29 2009

The Internet has made life easier in so many ways, including the ability to shop and conduct financial transactions online

FFIEC issues proposed guidance on social media risks and compliance

  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 25 2013

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) released a proposed guidance regarding the applicability of consumer protection

FRB and Treasury extend compliance date for internet gambling rule

  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 7 2009

On November 27th, the Federal Reserve Board and Treasury extended, from December 1st to June 1, 2010, the date for compliance with Regulation GG concerning the prevention of unlawful internet gambling