We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Karen Millen Fashions learned the hard way that obtaining the transfer of a domain name under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) requires more than simple assertions and the provision of actual evidence is necessary, even when the case looks like a slam dunk
Until recently it was only possible to recuperate domain names registered under .BR (Brazil) by filing court proceedings in Brazil based on a breach of Brazilian law, such as trade mark infringement
In a recent case decided under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) by a three-member panel from the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO), the company La Société des Bains de Mer et du Cercle des Etrangers à Monaco (the Complainant) obtained the transfer of the domain name (the Domain Name
XIHA Oy (the Complainant) recently lost its complaint filed with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) under the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) regarding the domain name (the Domain Name) on the grounds that Qiu Shengjie (the Respondent) had not registered the Domain Name in bad faith
A district court rules that a mandatory arbitration requirement in Blockbuster, Inc.’s online contract is illusory and unenforceable against customers because Blockbuster maintained the right to modify the terms of the contract at any time
