We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 19

Notice of appeal untimely where attorneys claimed that notice through electronic filing system did not start time for appeal

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 20 2014

After trial and the denial of post-trial motions, AT&T Operations, Inc. ("AT&T") filed motion to extend the time to file a notice of appeal pursuant

California’s do not track amendments

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 16 2014

Effective January 1, 2014, amendments to the California Online Privacy Protection Act ("CalOPPA") require all commercial websites and online services

Rembrandt v. Facebook: district court excludes damage expert where expert failed to apportion damages to patented features in accused product

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • December 11 2013

Rembrandt Social Media, LP ("Rembrandt") filed a patent infringement action against Facebook alleging that Facebook infringed two of its patents

Collecting customer information online

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 7 2013

In an opinion issued on February 4, 2013, the California Supreme Court (by a narrow 4-3 majority) resolved one of the burning questions in the

Chief Judge Kozinski rules in favor of Google finding Street View did not infringe Vederi's patents

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 15 2012

Vederi owns several patents which cover certain methods for enabling users to navigate a geographic area visually from a device, including a personal computer

The Federal Circuit continues to re-define what constitutes patentable subject matter under Section 101 after Bilski

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 27 2012

Bancorp Services, LLC (“Bancorp”) owns two United States patents, the 5,926,792 (“the ’792 patent”) and the 7,249,037 (“the ’037 patent”), both of which are entitled “System for Managing a Stable Value Protected Investment Plan.”

ESPN loses affirmative defenses and invalidity counterclaim on motion to dismiss but court recognizes unfairness in allowing "bare-bones" infringement complaint while prohibiting defendants from pleading affirmative defenses with brevity

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 19 2012

PageMelding filed a patent infringement action against ESPN asserting a patent that enables internet service and content providers to form mutually beneficial collaborations where website content is customized in accordance with those collaborations

WiFi "sniffing" ruled not a violation of the Wiretap Act where patent holder sought to collect information that was available over public WiFi networks

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 7 2012

Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC ("Innovatio") filed patent infringement actions against various hotels, coffee shops, restaurants and supermarkets for the use of wireless Internet technology located throughout the United States

Soverain Software v. J.C. Penney: denying summary judgment of non-infringement of e-commerce patent based on divided infringement theory

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 16 2012

Plaintiff Soverain Software alleged infringement of patents relating to e-commerce transactions over the Internet involving the use of a shopping cart and online statements

Losing the expectation of privacy bit by bit, byte by byte

  • Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 17 2012

For a generation that has become exceedingly facile with electronic gadgetry and desensitized to the massive amounts of data this gadgetry produces, it perhaps comes as no surprise that video surveillance and on-line monitoring by employers of present and potential employees' electronic profiles and fingerprints have become the norm