We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 21

IRS proposes 162(m) regulations for certain health insurance issuers

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 2 2013

Yesterday, the IRS proposed new regulations limiting the deductions that certain health insurance issuers may take for compensation paid to their

Weekly Washington healthcare update

  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 1 2013

Last week, Ways and Means Oversight Subcommittee Chairman Boustany wrote a letter to HHS Secretary Sebelius inquiring about a voter registration

The issues 2013: upcoming legal topics in the Czech Republic

  • CMS Cameron McKenna
  • -
  • Czech Republic
  • -
  • February 1 2013

The adoption of the new Civil Code and the Act on Corporations, effective as of 1 January 2014, is a step of great importance for the Czech law. There

Affordable Care Act: proposed regulations on employer shared responsibility

  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 10 2013

The Treasury Department recently published proposed excise tax regulations under section 4980H of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the

Health care reform's medical loss ratio rebates and their impact on employer group health plans

  • Snell & Wilmer
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 13 2012

Now that the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (collectively, the “Act”), employers must move forward with implementation

The “individual mandate” upheld under Congress’ power to tax; parts of Medicaid expansion upheld

  • Quarles & Brady LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 29 2012

In a split decision, the Supreme Court on June 28, 2012 upheld the Affordable Care Act’s (the ACA’s) “individual mandate,” which requires almost everyone to have health insurance coverage or pay a penalty

$2,500 limit on health FSAs, more guidance on SBCs, and other employee benefits news

  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • June 7 2012

The future of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) will be determined by the Supreme Court decision expected this month

IRS seeks guidance in developing PPACA regulations that directly impact employers

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 10 2012

On April 26, 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued three notices requesting comments relating to forthcoming regulations implementing PPACA's employer mandate, individual mandate and individual tax credit provisions

IRS fires shot across the bow on health reform minimum value and reporting guidance part 2

  • Bryan Cave LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2012

In addition to requesting comments on the determination of “minimum value” (discussed in our prior post here), the IRS is also asking for comments regarding the information reporting requirements regarding “minimum essential coverage” under PPACA and for reporting by employers subject to “play or pay” penalties

IRS notices address significant issues under the Affordable Care Act

  • Ballard Spahr LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 2 2012

In a series of three notices, the IRS has signaled the approach that it may take on certain key issues arising under the employer shared responsibility, or “pay or play,” provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and is seeking comment on these and other questions

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy