We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 14

Post-acquisition indemnity does not cover future events holds Delaware Chancery Court

  • Nishith Desai Associates
  • -
  • India, USA
  • -
  • January 17 2013

In a recent landmark ruling, Walter A. Winshall v. Viacom International Inc.1, the Delaware Court of Chancery has explained the scope of the

Top 10 lessons learned from the Vodafone, Aditya Birla and other tax cases in India

  • Pepper Hamilton LLP
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • September 29 2011

The rulings of the Bombay High Court in the famous US$2.5 billion tax assessment case against Vodafone in Vodafone v. Union of India and the rulings more recently in Aditya Birla Nuvo Limited v. DDIT and Union of India, New Cingular Wireless Services Inc. v. DDIT and Tata Industries Ltd. v. DDIT are all full of cautionary tales for foreign investors looking to buy Indian-related assets

Sanofi wins the indirect way

  • Singh & Associates
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • February 28 2013

Taxation Environment in a Country has also been and always remains a matter of concern for foreign investors. A foreign investor always

International regulatory update 7 - 11 January 2013

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • European Union, France, Global, India, Poland, Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • January 14 2013

EMIR: Extension of scrutiny period for Commission Delegated Regulations Basel III: Basel Committee releases revised version of Liquidity Coverage

Supreme Court of India's Vodafone judgment: implications for international investors

  • White & Case LLP
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • February 9 2012

On January 20, 2012, the Supreme Court of India (the “Supreme Court”) delivered a landmark judgment in Vodafone International B.V. v. Union of India & Anr

UK telecommunications company Vodafone recently receives favorable ruling from Supreme Court of India

  • Fox Rothschild LLP
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • June 26 2012

This past January, the Supreme Court in India ruled in Vodafone International Holdings B.V v. Union of India,Civil Appeal No. 733 of 2012 (arising from S.L.P. (C) No. 26529 of 2010) that the sale of stock of a company that was non-resident in India to another non-resident company was not subject to income tax in India

Vodafone not liable for taxes on Essar purchase, says India Supreme Court

  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • January 27 2012

A long-running battle between British wireless giant Vodafone and India’s tax authority ended in victory for Vodafone, as India’s Supreme Court decreed that Vodafone does not owe US$4.4 billion in taxes and penalties accruing from its $10.9 billion acquisition of Hutchison Essar in 2007

Vodafone ordered to deposit $554 million in Indian tax case

  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • November 19 2010

Pending a final decision on Vodafone’s appeal against a government directive that holds Vodafone liable for US$2.5 billion in taxes and interest accruing from the company’s 2007 acquisition of Hutchison Essar, the Supreme Court of India ordered Vodafone on Monday to submit a deposit of $554.1 million within three weeks as well as bank guarantees within eight weeks that would cover the outstanding portion of the government’s tax claim

India's Supreme Court rules for Vodafone - a welcome signal for global investors

  • Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
  • -
  • India
  • -
  • January 31 2012

The Indian Supreme Court’s decision in the Vodafone case brings to an end the long saga that has kept global investors on edge about the taxation of foreign acquisitions in India

Protecting your investments in foreign courtsan australian mining company secures bilateral investment treaty remedy for local court delays

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, India
  • -
  • March 5 2012

Australian mining company White Industries Australia Limited (White) has successfully brought a claim under the Australia-India bilateral investment treaty (BIT) seeking a remedy following a nine year delay by India’s courts

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy