We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 15

TUPE and making a business more attractive

  • Faegre Baker Daniels
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 30 2013

The Court of Appeal has held in Spaceright Europe Ltd v Baillavoine 2012 ICR 520 that where an administrator's reason for a dismissal is to make a

A summary of major developments in key areas

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, European Union, Indonesia, Myanmar, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 7 2013

The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) and institutional bodies have published the following guidance in relation to corporate governance and

General Counsel update - legal guide edition 32

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Australia, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Myanmar, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 29 2012

A summary of major developments in key areas

General counsel update - 27 September 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Indonesia, Myanmar, Spain, United Kingdom
  • -
  • September 27 2012

This is the 31st in our series of general counsel updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

Directors can you be personally liable for cost overruns?

  • Dentons
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • July 10 2012

Although cost overruns in construction and engineering projects are commonplace, a recent case in the TCC highlights a potential risk that most company directors in the sector may not be aware of personal liability for such overruns

Group structures: parent company assumed direct responsibility for subsidiary's employees

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 20 2012

On 25 April 2012, the Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the High Court which had previously found that a parent company owed a direct duty of care to an employee of its subsidiary

Recent developments for the fourth quarter 2011

  • Baker & McKenzie
  • -
  • Canada, China, Denmark, European Union, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom, USA
  • -
  • March 15 2012

The end of the year and beginning of a new year is always a busy time for us, as it is for most of our clients

General counsel update: 28 February 2012

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, Hong Kong, Spain, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 28 2012

This is the twenty-eighth in our series of General Counsel Updates which aim to summarise major developments in key areas

Changes to terms and conditions after a TUPE transfer

  • Shepherd & Wedderburn LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 11 2011

Two recent cases before the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) have considered whether post-TUPE transfer changes to terms and conditions were connected to the transfer, and thus void under TUPE

Dismissal automatically unfair under TUPE even though the transferee had not been identified at the time of dismissal

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • April 11 2011

The company went into administration on 23 May 2008 and the Chief Executive was dismissed on the same day