We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 12

Supreme Court narrows scope of antitrust immunity in ruling on hospital merger

  • Williams Mullen
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 25 2013

A unanimous U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the state-action immunity doctrine does not shield an allegedly anticompetitive hospital acquisition

Supreme Court tightens the scope of antitrust immunity in Government-owned hospital mergers

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 22 2013

In a unanimous and favorable decision for the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the Supreme Court found that the state action immunity doctrine does

Supreme Court unanimously rules unforeseeability bars immunity defense for allegedly anticompetitive hospital merger

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 21 2013

On February 19, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that state-action immunity does not protect a state-created hospital authority from

Supreme Court holds antitrust law applies to state hospital authority transaction

  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 21 2013

In one of the most closely watched healthcare antitrust cases in years, the Supreme Court issued its decision in the FTC merger challenge to a

FTC report shows that oil sector and pharmaceutical sector mergers are under the antitrust spotlight

  • Dechert LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • January 22 2013

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") issued a data report on January 4 regarding its horizontal merger investigation and enforcement action

Court to tackle "state action" for the first time in 20 years

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • October 23 2012

On 26 November, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear argument in FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, No. 11-1160, its first case in 20 years about "state action" immunity under the antitrust laws

Antitrust agencies challenge another healthcare provider acquisition

  • Bass, Berry & Sims PLC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 9 2012

Continuing a recent trend by antitrust enforcement authorities, on Monday the Federal Trade Commission and Nevada Attorney General announced proposed consent decrees settling litigation filed against Reno, Nevada’s largest hospital provider, Renown Health, relating to its recent acquisitions of two cardiology physician groups

FTC uses creative remedy to halt cardiology practice merger: requires suspension of employed physicians’ non-compete contracts

  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 9 2012

The Federal Trade Commission is leaving no stone unturned in its scrutiny of physician acquisitions, as indicated by its recent enforcement action regarding the acquisition of a small cardiology group in Reno, Nevada

Understanding recent developments in hospital merger enforcement

  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 9 2012

At last week’s Antitrust in Health Care conference sponsored by the American Health Lawyers Association and the American Bar Association, the heads of both federal antitrust enforcement agencies, the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, delivered remarks making clear that fighting anticompetitive effects in health care markets remains a top priority and that they will continue to pursue health care mergers that they believe threaten competition

Antitrust, competition and economic regulation client quarterly newsletter

  • Hogan Lovells
  • -
  • China, European Union, Greece, USA
  • -
  • January 24 2012

A public company CEO recently consented to a federal district court order requiring him to pay a $500,000 civil penalty for violating the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (“HSR Act”