We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Don’t game the system: “a motion to compel arbitration will almost never be futile”

  • Leonard, Street and Deinard
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 6 2012

After an arbitration about-face by the defendant in a class action, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that the defendant had waived its right to compel arbitration by: participating in litigation for two years and affirmatively declining to enforce its arbitration agreement with the plaintiffs until after SCOTUS issued its Concepcion decision

Individual arbitration is plaintiff’s “only remedy, illusory or not” Third Circuit

  • Leonard, Street and Deinard
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • August 30 2012

The earthquake that was the Concepcion decision (in April of 2011) is still sending aftershocks throughout the judicial system

New federal agency will study financial arbitrations

  • Leonard, Street and Deinard
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • April 26 2012

Just a few months after its first Director took office in January of 2012, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is embarking on a study of arbitration

Rule-making comes to the rescue of class arbitration

  • Leonard, Street and Deinard
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • February 9 2012

A reasonable person may have thought that the Supreme Court effectively killed off class arbitrations with its decisions in Stolt-Nielsen and Concepcion, but at least two government agencies have recently made decisions that ensure financial consumers and employees can bring classwide claims in some arbitrations