We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo






  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 125

Rumeli v. Republic of Kazakhstan (ICSID Case No. arb0516), Annulment Proceeding, Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee, March 25, 2010

  • King & Spalding LLP
  • -
  • Kazakhstan
  • -
  • November 17 2010

Kazakhstan sought the annulment of the Tribunal’s damages award on the basis that it was “inexplicable, being based on inconsistent, illogical or nonexistent reasons,” and that the Tribunal had failed to adequately state the reasons for its decision on the quantum of damages

Uganda Telecom Limited v Hi-Tech Telecom Pty Ltd 2011 FCA 131

  • Gilbert + Tobin
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • June 30 2011

In Uganda Telecom Limited v Hi-Tech Telecom Pty Ltd 2011 FCA 131, Uganda Telecom (located in Uganda) entered into a Telecommunication Service Contract with Hi-Tech (located in Australia). The contract included a clause that required disputes to be submitted to arbitration

Arbitration of non-arbitrable claim ordered since it was collateral to an unpleaded arbitrable claim asserted as a set-off

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • July 23 2009

OrbitCom, Inc. (“OrbitCom”) brought suit against Qwest Communications Corp. (“Qwest”) seeking the recovery of telecommunications access fees

London court awards Vivendi $2.41 billion in dispute over Polish wireless stake

  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • -
  • France, Poland, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 27 2009

French media conglomerate Vivendi received a long-awaited boost in its effort to win back its stake in Polish wireless carrier Polska Telefonia Cyfrowa (PTC), as a tribunal associated with the London Court of International Arbitration ordered Elektrima Polish utility firm that once partnered with Vivendi in PTCto pay the French firm US $2.491 billion in damages and interest

Third Circuit confirms that Federal Arbitration Act preempts state law deeming class arbitration waivers unconscionable

  • Jorden Burt LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • September 12 2011

The Third Circuit reversed a prior decision and held that, under the Supreme Court’s ruling in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, a New Jersey law providing that class arbitration waivers in consumer adhesion contracts are unconscionable is preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act

Supreme Arbitrazh Court in Russia publishes reasoning in Sony Ericsson case invalidating unilateral options in dispute resolution clauses

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • Russia
  • -
  • September 14 2012

The dispute in this case involved a claim filed by CJSC “Russkaya Telefonnaya Kompaniya” (“RTK”) against LLC “Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Rus” (“Sony Ericsson”) with the Arbitrazh Court of the City of Moscow under a contract for the sale of mobile phones

Sony Ericsson case to be heard in Russia despite LCIA arbitration clause

  • Faegre Baker Daniels
  • -
  • Russia
  • -
  • August 23 2012

Over recent years, the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) has proved to be a preferred place of arbitration for Russian entities

2010 year in review: key legal and regulatory developments

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • December 28 2010

In this last issue for the year 2010, the Allen & Gledhill Legal Bulletin provides an overview of the key developments in 2010

Review of 2009 and preview of 2010

  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • -
  • European Union, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 15 2010

The transition from 2009 to 2010 sees some significant legislative chapters closing, notably the Companies Act 2006, Rome I and II, the Banking Act 2009 and the Lisbon Treaty

In the courts

  • Arent Fox LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • November 22 2010

On November 16, 2010, the US District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss filed by Google and HTC and a motion to compel arbitration filed by T-Mobile in a putative class action claiming that the Nexus One mobile phone (or Google Phone) is defective by not maintaining connectivity to T-Mobile's 3G mobile network

Current Search

Suggested Facets

Author

Firm Name

Jurisdiction

Workarea

© Copyright 2006-2013 Globe Business Publishing Ltd | Cookies | Disclaimer | Privacy policy