We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-4 of 4

Chinese court reiterates that tort claims can be subject to arbitration

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • China, Singapore
  • -
  • August 31 2012

In this case, Kolmar (as the sellers) and Fujian Sunway Resources Co Ltd ("Sunway", as the buyers) entered into a contract for sale and purchase of a parcel of Indonesia steam coal ("Cargo"

Distinguishing between in rem and in personam actions when staying in favour of arbitration

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • September 30 2010

Section 6 of the International Arbitration Act allows the Court to stay legal proceedings in favour of international arbitration

Clarifying the application of The Achilleas as limited exception to the rule in Hadley v Baxendale

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 17 2010

The test for remoteness of damages in contract has long been accepted to be that in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341

High Court resolves conflict between arbitration provision and court jurisdiction clause

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • March 31 2010

Toh Kian Sing SC, Ian Teo and Aston Lai from the Admiralty & Shipping Practice of Rajah & Tann LLp acted for the plaintiff, Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd, in successfully appealing against the decision of the Assistant Registrar in Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd v burgundy Exploration Corp 2010 SGHC 31