We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-7 of 7

Determining the proper law of an arbitration agreement

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 20 2012

An arbitration agreement is a unique clause in a contract because it exists separately from the contract in which it is found

Contract law - developments in 2011

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Australia, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 16 2012

2011 saw many legal developments in the area of contract law both internationally as well as in Singapore

Arbitration law - developments in 2011

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Global, Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • January 26 2012

Through the years, arbitration as a mode of dispute resolution has gained prominence because it promotes party autonomy with minimal court intervention, amongst others

Apparent bias on the part of adjudicators

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • March 3 2011

In Fileturn Ltd v Royal Garden Hotel Ltd 2010 EWHC 1736 (TCC), the English High Court faced an application for summary judgment to enforce an adjudicator's award

Bringing a party to court without breaching an arbitration agreement

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Mexico, United Kingdom
  • -
  • February 24 2011

The purpose of arbitration agreements is clear - they bring their disputes to arbitration instead of before the Court

Bringing a party to court without breaching an arbitration agreement

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • November 16 2010

The purpose of arbitration agreements is clear - they bind the parties to bring their disputes to arbitration instead of before the Court

Clarifying the application of The Achilleas as limited exception to the rule in Hadley v Baxendale

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 17 2010

The test for remoteness of damages in contract has long been accepted to be that in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341