We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
In cooperation with Association of Corporate Counsel
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-8 of 8

Impeaching an arbitral award in the Singapore High Courtnatural justice

  • Jones Day
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • November 22 2013

The sanctity of arbitration proceedings and awards was again preserved by the Singapore High Court in its decision in TMM Division Maritima SA de CV

Tribunal considers issues of estoppel where a Singapore court had already concluded that the respondents were not in fact charterers of the subject vessel

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • May 7 2013

Disputes arose under a time charter. Owners commenced arbitration proceedings, contending that the Respondents, a company incorporated in St Vincent

Chinese court reiterates that tort claims can be subject to arbitration

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • China, Singapore
  • -
  • August 31 2012

In this case, Kolmar (as the sellers) and Fujian Sunway Resources Co Ltd ("Sunway", as the buyers) entered into a contract for sale and purchase of a parcel of Indonesia steam coal ("Cargo"

Singapore High Court considers application for leave to appeal against arbitration award based on four questions of law

  • Allen & Gledhill LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • March 8 2012

The Singapore High Court in Prestige Marine Services Pte Ltd v Marubeni International Petroleum (S) Pte Ltd considered an appeal against an arbitration award based on four question of law

Case report: claim for unpaid slot fees: should proceedings be stayed for arbitration

  • Rodyk & Davidson LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • April 29 2011

The related cases of The "Makassar Caraka Jaya Niaga III-39" - 2010 SGHC 306 The "Pontianak Caraka Jaya Niaga III-34" - 2010 SGHC 307 applied the decision in Tjong Very Sumito on the issue of prevarication on the alleged debtor's part as to whether there is a "dispute" between the parties warrants a stay of proceedings."

Distinguishing between in rem and in personam actions when staying in favour of arbitration

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • September 30 2010

Section 6 of the International Arbitration Act allows the Court to stay legal proceedings in favour of international arbitration

Clarifying the application of The Achilleas as limited exception to the rule in Hadley v Baxendale

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore, United Kingdom
  • -
  • June 17 2010

The test for remoteness of damages in contract has long been accepted to be that in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341

High Court resolves conflict between arbitration provision and court jurisdiction clause

  • Rajah & Tann LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • March 31 2010

Toh Kian Sing SC, Ian Teo and Aston Lai from the Admiralty & Shipping Practice of Rajah & Tann LLp acted for the plaintiff, Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd, in successfully appealing against the decision of the Assistant Registrar in Transocean Offshore International Ventures Ltd v burgundy Exploration Corp 2010 SGHC 31