We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Lexology logo
  Request new password

Search results

Order by most recent / most popular / relevance

Results: 1-10 of 3,829

Federal Circuit refuses to enjoin international arbitration of patent claims

  • Leonard, Street and Deinard
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 16 2013

Just after I posted about the awesome power of federal courts to enjoin other cases, the Federal Circuit reminds us the power is not absolute. In

Mind games: distinguishing between mood problems and mental disorders when disciplining employees

  • Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP
  • -
  • Canada
  • -
  • May 15 2013

It is trite law that employers cannot discriminate against employees based on mental disabilities. The broad interpretation that courts and

Substantive fairness overcomes elements of procedural unconscionability in mandatory arbitration agreement

  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

In yet another case addressing the enforceability of mandatory arbitration agreements in California, a Southern California federal district court in

“Reasonable endeavours” and “suspension of services”

  • Fenwick Elliott Solicitors
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 14 2013

This was an application for leave to appeal against an arbitration award in relation to a dispute arising out of Morris’ decision to suspend

Tenth Circuit holds underlying securities claims interrelated

  • Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

In its recent decision in Brecek & Young Advisors, Inc. v. Lloyds of London Syndicate 2003, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 9599 (10th Cir. May 13, 2013), the

Postscript: to compel under the FAA or the MAA? That is the question . . . With an answer

  • Ogletree Deakins
  • -
  • USA
  • -
  • May 14 2013

In a previous post, I argued that in order to compel arbitration in Minnesota, an employer must attempt to come within the purview of the Federal

New FIDIC guidance: should a party to a FIDIC contract be able to enforce a ‘binding’ DAB decision before the decision has become ‘final’?

  • Reed Smith LLP
  • -
  • Singapore
  • -
  • May 13 2013

The standard FIDIC form of contract contains a tiered dispute resolution provision (clause 20). The first step is a referral of a dispute to a

Foreign arbitral award enforceable against an Australian corporation in liquidation

  • Corrs Chambers Westgarth
  • -
  • Australia
  • -
  • May 10 2013

On 19 April 2013, the Federal Court of Australia handed down judgment in Eopply New Energy Technology Co Ltd v EP Solar Pty Ltd 2013 FCA 356

Conciliation clause held too uncertain to be enforceable

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 10 2013

Dispute resolution clauses in many commercial agreements provide for claims to be submitted to conciliation or mediation before they can be submitted

Courts refuse to restrain foreign proceedings in support of London arbitration

  • Clifford Chance LLP
  • -
  • United Kingdom
  • -
  • May 10 2013

Where parties have stipulated in their contracts that disputes should be submitted to London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) arbitration in