Search results
Order by most recent / most popular / relevance
Results: 1-4 of 4
Australian companies’ use of bilateral investment treaties to protect foreign investments on the increase
- King & Wood Mallesons
- -
- Australia
- -
- January 23 2013
Bilateral Investment Treaties often provide the most favourable recourse to an investor whose foreign investment has been effected by the actions of
When does ‘may’ mean ‘must’ in a dispute resolution clause?
- King & Wood Mallesons
- -
- Australia
- -
- August 2 2012
The recent decision of Corboy J in Cape Lambert Resources Ltd v MCC Australia Sanjin Mining Pty Ltd 2012 WASC 228 highlights the need for parties to be precise when drafting dispute resolution clauses to ensure certainty, as well as safeguarding the parties’ ability to enforce the dispute resolution clause in the event of a dispute
Protecting your investments in foreign courtsan australian mining company secures bilateral investment treaty remedy for local court delays
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
- -
- Australia, India
- -
- March 5 2012
Australian mining company White Industries Australia Limited (White) has successfully brought a claim under the Australia-India bilateral investment treaty (BIT) seeking a remedy following a nine year delay by India’s courts
Enforcing arbitral awards against non-parties to an arbitration agreement
- Clayton Utz
- -
- Australia
- -
- February 25 2011
Courts will enforce an arbitral award even against a non-party to the arbitration agreement
