We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics. If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.
Mr. Justice Tugendhat in the recent case of Accentuate Ltd v Asigra Inc 2009 EWHC 2655 (QB), held that a claimant had a good arguable case that a Canadian arbitration and jurisdiction clause, was not enforceable because that clause would result in EU Regulations not being taken into account
Argentina, Australia, Belarus, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, European Union, Global, Hong Kong, India, Iran, Ireland, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, Myanmar, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Russia, Rwanda, South Africa, Switzerland, Syria, Ukraine, United Kingdom, USA, Vanuatu , Yemen
-
August 6 2012
Covering Customs and Other Import Requirements, Export Controls and Sanctions, Trade Remedies, WTO and Anti-Corruption
